From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from office2.cesnet.cz (office2.cesnet.cz [195.113.144.244]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3292A8D3B for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1220:c1a2:dd10:59e7:dbdd:9ac9] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1220:c1a2:dd10:59e7:dbdd:9ac9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by office2.cesnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C9E40004E; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:21:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=office2; t=1524036069; bh=63O7sucfAB5UzwInwmrjE22p5zooWpZ9UFBwAezVL4M=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=s6fVWjYpl3OPMRAcRwkdPFdo5UT+oJmgp2flvnYki1itfSB770vnuKpj+7aQSYDG8 PR69AfGmsS9ajSY+tcEdfiW6hHJARSjSolEIKDurmJhkasx6dOQKYsKYDfDbQqtnTy 2Ed24SPZCQB5AYIunAytwvFyYPXxK41Nwzz8L2ow= To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Reme=c5=a1?= , dev@dpdk.org, fpga-sw References: <1523023929-1257-1-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz> <1523518890-7075-3-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz> <6df92274-3b39-4750-0823-a234cffad048@intel.com> <1641ecc9-0d2a-d188-90ca-abf1991f821f@intel.com> <169d539d-a30c-dd80-394c-7740aac9c0de@intel.com> From: Matej Vido Message-ID: <90271791-d96b-b756-f5c3-90e1136a88b8@cesnet.cz> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:21:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <169d539d-a30c-dd80-394c-7740aac9c0de@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/szedata2: add support for new NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 07:21:10 -0000 On 13.04.2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/13/2018 4:03 PM, Jan Remeš wrote: >> It is mentioned on the website with the packages itself. The current >> version works with the reworked PMD - there is a headline which says: >> "DPDK from 18.05" (since we expect the patches to land in the upcoming >> release; we will update it if this does not happen). >> >> The older version is still available on the website, with appropriate >> installation steps and a headline that says "DPDK up to 18.02". >> >> Is this form of documentation sufficient for you or would you like to >> see it mentioned in the DPDK documentation as well? > I think it is better to have some level of information in DPDK documentation too. > > There is already a release note update in this set, do you think does it make > sense to mention new dependency there? > > I will get patches right now, please send doc/release notes updates as > incremental patches. Hi Ferruh, we will send the follow-up patches updating both documentation and release notes soon. Thanks, Matej > >> Thanks, >> Jan >> Jan Remeš | Software Developer >> Netcope Technologies, a.s. >> >> T: +420 530 510 680 >> A: Sochorova 3232/34, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic >> W: www.netcope.com >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>> On 4/13/2018 9:17 AM, Jan Remeš wrote: >>>>> Hi Matej, >>>>> >>>>> Where szedata_get_area_numa_node() is defined? >>>>> Is it possible that you are missing a patch? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> ferruh >>>> Hi Ferruh, >>>> >>>> the new PMD requires an updated version of libsze2 and drivers. We >>>> have just published the updated packages here: >>>> https://www.netcope.com/en/company/community-support/dpdk-libsze2. >>> DPDK documentation mentions about libsze2 dependency but there is no version >>> mentioned. >>> >>> And I have not seen any note that says a new version of library is required, >>> perhaps I missed it, is there a documentation which says which version of DPDK >>> requires which version of the dependencies? >>> >>> What is the way of tracing this dependency? >>> >>>> Sorry for the hickup. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Jan >>>>