From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C1C6885
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x13so5774178wgg.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=3wHqWI12RwFz2EtRLGR4Gq808+RZzfF5oiGaLFJYDRw=;
 b=gqFZjWLOV7ouzvHMHaCLCakd+AyDkQTkntFdacHUjwjI61IRPZxKmuR7Mx/pfbjaZP
 rP1PO+G6Z6KI0TspgU94jBD/hbNNTgeVJcvZAKy2rsJfxyhksAqLtFnKM8yHZR0uzBzX
 OPvk+uC4hXCtQ+wXTbVzvcIJ0LTFNbOp2oUv8Tk7smCiViNnNEq4QYUwp2w1mYe+z1y4
 E9EEs8BJbQ+LlqTgZmFGCGQwtwD5aBORzBXHniZM96Qs95bq0BAoaYwM3TUVCKH4PiC+
 OUMzf0JUkYQgCZXgNU+ffOP50fcE56WTZ4FJO2J6UKjWcZOTszaH1GIwaX6D0zELwLzZ
 Uykg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkp0cZawHmIegee8ZwtmlJGrH25yMcdxZeMLAibdRIXwcCdcZj66CW9CsXCVxBpMKm90aLx
X-Received: by 10.180.37.17 with SMTP id u17mr28085609wij.15.1411571460125;
 Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lf1sm19527869wjb.24.2014.09.24.08.10.58
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:10:51 +0200
Message-ID: <9049135.zKavqy3ols@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD011A98C5@BPXM14GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
References: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD011A98C5@BPXM14GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Hayato Momma <h-momma@ce.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [memnic PATCH 1/7] guest: memnic-tester: PMD
	benchmark in guest
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:04:47 -0000

Hi Hiroshi,

2014-09-11 07:46, Hiroshi Shimamoto:
>  master |<- put packets ->|     |<- get packets ->|
>  slave  |   |<- rx packets ->|<- tx packets ->|   |
>         |<----------------- set ----------------->|
> 
> Measuring how many sets in the certain period, that represents
> the MEMNIC PMD performance. The master workload must be very low.

Sorry, I don't really understand this diagram and the associated explanation.
Could you try to reword it?

Thanks
-- 
Thomas