From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197352965 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g62so231631267wme.1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:42:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=ZxrSxN927CbR02oGpWqF6sTu+CZqE3qxbP9PpBRptV4=; b=l157bNBF+OjM+/JYLOX1a+ABJZfwyeow231coVjgq6KOIoPWp7MINZWBGBuyKaHS6F GcsknDyvtjy4FaI9eVdHlCNd+mwGPub2KDNDqt7BEs5aPfPsLgr+q3PQ6Zm4Wabv/b+w I2CmGjUsZjYqqUgwPBps6+mVdEV8aNGb8bbWEWUU4Et5fuNPd+aDQjDqEBnHf4KmQl4g miDt4m5Q/olIvFzV6JcaHt+895Ma7cQjEGs4mt9CzBgX/AttSOOi17Ojv9E0nH4XyeIo SPtM/3k8U4K/2un6We74dwa9rsSc43sgZEVoD+VTY+vSGRZmylAW8vNT2NmR8adivvce 2Sow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=ZxrSxN927CbR02oGpWqF6sTu+CZqE3qxbP9PpBRptV4=; b=aC9ZWRoTeGKgXN6sQetJY78Sq2v1XzhwCT/y8GZs+Xg7jHVtNPBlh7Nf+i9Z9jBnwu Jcfsr275vYdnlx/fYDVvrnQCSEqTLgXtpRFxWlbhikxLBufr42NGDckxkMKAjSsN9loc EdptTHGW1Qnl7wRlfBlBluq6sgBM8osMvoq96OyjfQd5g5ag3ODGep24eMvrLCiiSjvY 8u4NKMVmVt5lx5BP3pgoST1N6P4y1Xda9HQ1n2UB1F0kiaXv0XUHqnh7cV6GarUaoAFc owHLheJgswVfrkoVGP9kajgVx6xR5iR4ay3wA2MUaEN32iNjSMeLU8fqMJm+MXHDwXnX wSRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTPSvVjdqZndbQiQI1UnLTvZImAI3/wyOwAtnhuyFeV3eLUKYVRSg8TW+DD+rfSVZZF X-Received: by 10.28.187.134 with SMTP id l128mr18775794wmf.61.1456245761945; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c136sm26868457wmd.3.2016.02.23.08.42.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:42:40 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: <91026831.UvMIbM9v17@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <5212003.dKKWlXxaE8@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:42:42 -0000 2016-02-23 10:03, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above? > > > > So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration? > > You just want to show how to use it with DPDK? > > You are correct. The technology can be used without tight DPDK integration but will require users to reach out to existing open source code. > Based on received feedback about EAL PQoS extensions we backed off to sort of a sample code. If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in DPDK? Maybe the example should be better in the library itself. I suggest to mention the library in doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst