From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EEB593A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:18:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2014 09:20:46 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,769,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="623303605"
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2014 09:15:22 -0700
Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.99) by
 IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:14:46 +0100
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.21]) by
 IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.68]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:14:46 +0100
From: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
To: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>, "Thomas
 Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Update libs build process
Thread-Index: AQHP48Hmw5W1lP9A7Ue0L3JVDzqgbJwuNZcwgAwpdQCAAf+RIA==
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:14:45 +0000
Message-ID: <91383E96CE459D47BCE92EFBF5CE73B0C7FDDE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1412592755-3370-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <1412859898-29068-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <91383E96CE459D47BCE92EFBF5CE73B0C7E2B6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <91383E96CE459D47BCE92EFBF5CE73B0C7F7E6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <91383E96CE459D47BCE92EFBF5CE73B0C7F7E6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Update libs build process
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:18:33 -0000

Dropping patch set.

Thanks,
Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalez Monroy,
> Sergio
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:44 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Update libs build process
>=20
> Hi Thomas,
>=20
> Given that most of the comments/discussion for this patch set revolved
> around the removal of COMBINE_LIBS and what libs to build by default, I a=
m
> inclined to drop this patch set, submit minimal patch to fix compiler err=
ors
> (initial and main purpose of this patch set) and then submit an RFC regar=
ding
> the use/removal of COMBINE_LIBS and other outstanding issues in the build
> system.
>=20
> Does that sound like a better approach?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Sergio
>=20