DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support age shared action context
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:50:10 +0000
Message-ID: <9183aeb8-240f-ee83-8997-7628cc73077c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1604252927-213452-1-git-send-email-matan@nvidia.com>

On 11/1/2020 5:48 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> When an age action becomes aged-out the rte_flow_get_aged_flows should
> return the action context supplied by the configuration structure.
> 
> In case the age action created by the shared action API, the shared
> action context of the Testpmd application was not set.
> 
> In addition, the application handler of the contexts returned by the
> rte_flow_get_aged_flows API didn't consider the fact that the action
> could be set by the shared action API and considered it as regular flow
> context.
> 
> This caused a crash in Testpmd when the context is parsed.
> 
> This patch set context type in the flow and shared action context and
> uses it to parse the aged-out contexts correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   app/test-pmd/config.c  | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   app/test-pmd/testpmd.h |  7 +++++++
>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> index e0203f0..3581f3d 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> @@ -1665,8 +1665,10 @@ void port_flow_tunnel_create(portid_t port_id, const struct tunnel_ops *ops)
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>   	if (rte_flow_conv(RTE_FLOW_CONV_OP_RULE, &pf->rule, ret, &rule,
> -			  error) >= 0)
> +			  error) >= 0) {
> +		pf->ctype = CONTEXT_TYPE_FLOW;
>   		return pf;
> +	}
>   	free(pf);
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> @@ -1831,6 +1833,7 @@ void port_flow_tunnel_create(portid_t port_id, const struct tunnel_ops *ops)
>   	}
>   	psa->next = *ppsa;
>   	psa->id = id;
> +	psa->ctype = CONTEXT_TYPE_SHARED_ACTION;
>   	*ppsa = psa;
>   	*action = psa;
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1849,6 +1852,12 @@ void port_flow_tunnel_create(portid_t port_id, const struct tunnel_ops *ops)
>   	ret = action_alloc(port_id, id, &psa);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> +	if (action->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_AGE) {
> +		struct rte_flow_action_age *age =
> +				(void *)(uintptr_t)(action->conf);
> +
> +		age->context = psa;
> +	}

The port flow is using 'update_age_action_context()' function, can same function 
be utilized to update age context for shared action too?

btw, not sure why 'update_age_action_context()' is not static, if you will touch 
it can you please make it static function?

And overall this context setting for the age action is requiring the special 
conditions in the flow create path, can you please check if it can be moved to 
'cmdline_flow.c' for age parsing code somehow?

>   	/* Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case of error. */
>   	memset(&error, 0x22, sizeof(error));
>   	psa->action = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, conf, action,
> @@ -2379,7 +2388,10 @@ struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>   	void **contexts;
>   	int nb_context, total = 0, idx;
>   	struct rte_flow_error error;
> -	struct port_flow *pf;
> +	union {
> +		struct port_flow *pf;
> +		struct port_shared_action *psa;
> +	} ctx;
>   
>   	if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
>   	    port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
> @@ -2397,7 +2409,7 @@ struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>   		printf("Cannot allocate contexts for aged flow\n");
>   		return;
>   	}
> -	printf("ID\tGroup\tPrio\tAttr\n");
> +	printf("%-20s\tID\tGroup\tPrio\tAttr\n", "Type");
>   	nb_context = rte_flow_get_aged_flows(port_id, contexts, total, &error);
>   	if (nb_context != total) {
>   		printf("Port:%d get aged flows count(%d) != total(%d)\n",
> @@ -2406,18 +2418,31 @@ struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>   		return;
>   	}
>   	for (idx = 0; idx < nb_context; idx++) {
> -		pf = (struct port_flow *)contexts[idx];
> -		if (!pf) {
> +		ctx.pf = (struct port_flow *)contexts[idx];
> +		if (!ctx.pf) {
>   			printf("Error: get Null context in port %u\n", port_id);
>   			continue;
>   		}
> -		printf("%" PRIu32 "\t%" PRIu32 "\t%" PRIu32 "\t%c%c%c\t\n",
> -		       pf->id,
> -		       pf->rule.attr->group,
> -		       pf->rule.attr->priority,
> -		       pf->rule.attr->ingress ? 'i' : '-',
> -		       pf->rule.attr->egress ? 'e' : '-',
> -		       pf->rule.attr->transfer ? 't' : '-');
> +		switch (ctx.pf->ctype) {


At this stage you don't know if the context is 'pf' or 'psa', but you rely that 
both structure first element is "enum testpmd_context_type" and this requirement 
is completely undocumented.

Why don't create a common context and pass that one the the age action for both 
'pf' & 'psa', like

struct port_flow_age_action_context {
     enum testpmd_context_type ctype;
     union {
         struct port_flow *pf;
         struct port_shared_action *psa;
     } ctx;
};

I think this also prevents to corrupt 'pf' and 'psa' just for age action.

> +		case CONTEXT_TYPE_FLOW:
> +			printf("%-20s\t%" PRIu32 "\t%" PRIu32 "\t%" PRIu32
> +								 "\t%c%c%c\t\n",
> +			       "Flow",
> +			       ctx.pf->id,
> +			       ctx.pf->rule.attr->group,
> +			       ctx.pf->rule.attr->priority,
> +			       ctx.pf->rule.attr->ingress ? 'i' : '-',
> +			       ctx.pf->rule.attr->egress ? 'e' : '-',
> +			       ctx.pf->rule.attr->transfer ? 't' : '-');
> +			break;
> +		case CONTEXT_TYPE_SHARED_ACTION:
> +			printf("%-20s\t%" PRIu32 "\n", "Shared action",
> +			       ctx.psa->id);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			printf("Error: invalid context type %u\n", port_id);
> +			break;
> +		}
>   	}
>   	if (destroy) {
>   		int ret;
> @@ -2426,15 +2451,15 @@ struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>   		total = 0;
>   		printf("\n");
>   		for (idx = 0; idx < nb_context; idx++) {
> -			pf = (struct port_flow *)contexts[idx];
> -			if (!pf)
> +			ctx.pf = (struct port_flow *)contexts[idx];
> +			if (!ctx.pf || ctx.pf->ctype != CONTEXT_TYPE_FLOW)
>   				continue;

When the context is 'CONTEXT_TYPE_SHARED_ACTION', who destroys it?

> -			flow_id = pf->id;
> +			flow_id = ctx.pf->id;
>   			ret = port_flow_destroy(port_id, 1, &flow_id);
>   			if (!ret)
>   				total++;
>   		}
> -		printf("%d flows be destroyed\n", total);
> +		printf("%d flows destroyed\n", total);
>   	}
>   	free(contexts);
>   }
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> index 519d551..92aaa19 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> @@ -143,8 +143,14 @@ struct fwd_stream {
>   	struct pkt_burst_stats tx_burst_stats;
>   };
>   
> +enum testpmd_context_type {
> +	CONTEXT_TYPE_FLOW,
> +	CONTEXT_TYPE_SHARED_ACTION,
> +};
> +

The enum prefix is too generic, 'CONTEXT_TYPE_', what do you think clarifying 
what context we are talking about?

>   /** Descriptor for a single flow. */
>   struct port_flow {
> +	enum testpmd_context_type ctype; /**< Context type. */
>   	struct port_flow *next; /**< Next flow in list. */
>   	struct port_flow *tmp; /**< Temporary linking. */
>   	uint32_t id; /**< Flow rule ID. */
> @@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ struct port_flow {
>   
>   /* Descriptor for shared action */
>   struct port_shared_action {
> +	enum testpmd_context_type ctype; /**< Context type. */
>   	struct port_shared_action *next; /**< Next flow in list. */
>   	uint32_t id; /**< Shared action ID. */
>   	enum rte_flow_action_type type; /**< Action type. */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-02 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-01 17:48 Matan Azrad
2020-11-02 18:50 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-11-03  7:33   ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-04 12:58     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-04 13:28       ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-04 13:45         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-05 21:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Matan Azrad
2020-11-06 13:57   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-07 17:30     ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-09 10:21       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-09 10:38         ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-09 11:12           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-10  8:30             ` Ori Kam
2020-11-10  9:43               ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-10 10:58                 ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-10 17:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Matan Azrad
2020-11-11 12:51     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9183aeb8-240f-ee83-8997-7628cc73077c@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git