From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8085EC606 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 05:25:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oift201 with SMTP id t201so127515696oif.3 for ; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:25:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=pNPGuR2AUrCZKKym4w4C4G84tdVypXddQCPaShsuszg=; b=K2q2ifeNRODWyu3mVdsQFAKFX1gh+lqk2OpZTtaUQ0zbPZ9mf8eWWdAnVBvzb/nzd9 sPo8gXbqWeEvJjRjXP7KhHKTsVyBwqT8R1W3MmRjGWsZJy4E9bs5xdMPUvg0eT/IGKbS 8rIWymJoqGAe+ylMmfORuk1T/8hSwAAyytlQnaeS1PQsPxJDR6+MJZEqnjIliCWZJny7 bsEWmeCVyiRlFUCNS2t67DybolGMs6gtl1h65XmE9p2VUgYayAZt7PIK4vd/XBl2HmLB HF4UWRNgBNJ2Ri5SU4nQjIEaziifzJKNAasFAGqmuHvTGqn6WdCg4nwj6WXXw54vuHi+ 99Gw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpBI+wOmEoZl6X5x+S0Yv1/7j+rE9+DVoPztjr1MSo5vvn7E8yWhAaz/gUJ7D/c7zHJzdW X-Received: by 10.182.28.106 with SMTP id a10mr20502924obh.55.1430796301860; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jims-mbp.netgate.com (65-36-83-120.static.grandenetworks.net. [65.36.83.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y62sm8937798oif.12.2015.05.04.20.25.01 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 May 2015 20:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) From: Jim Thompson In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 22:25:00 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <924D0FD1-4A1F-4C3E-929C-38C29AED61D7@netgate.com> References: <20150501164512.GB27756@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150501173108.GA24714@mhcomputing.net> <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E602860466B524@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20150504174857.GA27496@mhcomputing.net> To: "Wiles, Keith" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 03:25:02 -0000 > On May 4, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Wiles, Keith = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 5/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote: >>> What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread = mode >>> is important for patch review. >>=20 >> Like many UNIX people, I use mutt. >>=20 >> My concern is that, if we're making the widespread adoption, usage, = and >> contributions for DPDK dependent on selection or debate of the = features >> of=20 >> various MUAs, I'm not sure that we're looking at this from the right >> angle. >>=20 >> I'm just trying to figure out how to get DPDK in the place where the = most >> eyeballs are, rather than trying to drag the eyeballs to the place = where >> DPDK=20 >> is. >=20 > +1, I agree with this statement completely and I feel discussions = about an > MUA is non-productive and out of scope. +1. I=E2=80=99ve avoided the whole discussion, because =E2=80=A6 ok, = =E2=80=9Cnon-productive and out of scope=E2=80=9D is a polite way of = saying it. jim