Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process

["Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>]

在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd
>>>> processes:
>>>>
>>>>    * the primary process:
>>>>
>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>>>
>>>>    * the secondary process:
>>>>
>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> V16:
>>>> * revert unrelated changes.
>>>> * add some restrictions in doc.
>>>
>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.
>>>
>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.
>>>
>> Hi, Thomas,
>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
>> please check it out, thanks.
> 
> Andrew's comment from v15:
> "
> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
> consider is a start point to be applied.
> "
Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
     What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
meet the state sufficient to be applied?

> 
> 
> .
>