DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, zhihong.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] net/virtio: vring init for packed queues
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:51:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <931e66a9-5f22-e241-0cbe-4640698543ec@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181025134737.vzstdn5td7b55nej@jenstp.localdomain>



On 10/25/18 3:48 PM, Jens Freimann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:21:15PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:32:29PM +0200, Jens Freimann wrote:
>>> Add and initialize descriptor data structures.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 18 ++++----
>>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h    |  7 +++
>>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ring.h   | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h     | 15 +++++-
>>>  4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c 
>>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> index 730c41707..6130aef16 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -299,19 +299,21 @@ virtio_init_vring(struct virtqueue *vq)
>>>
>>>      PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>>
>>> -    /*
>>> -     * Reinitialise since virtio port might have been stopped and 
>>> restarted
>>> -     */
>>
>> Why above comments are removed?
> 
> by mistake, I'll put them back in next version.
>>
>>>      memset(ring_mem, 0, vq->vq_ring_size);
>>> -    vring_init(vr, size, ring_mem, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>>> +    vring_init(vq->hw, vr, size, ring_mem, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>>> +
>>>      vq->vq_used_cons_idx = 0;
>>>      vq->vq_desc_head_idx = 0;
>>>      vq->vq_avail_idx = 0;
>>>      vq->vq_desc_tail_idx = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_nentries - 1);
>>>      vq->vq_free_cnt = vq->vq_nentries;
>>>      memset(vq->vq_descx, 0, sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra) * 
>>> vq->vq_nentries);
>>> -
>>> -    vring_desc_init(vr->desc, size);
>>> +    if (vtpci_packed_queue(vq->hw)) {
>>> +        if (!vtpci_with_feature(vq->hw, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER))
>>> +            vring_desc_init_packed(vq, size);
>>
>> Don't we need to initialize descs in IN-ORDER case?
> 
> Yes, I missed this here. I'll fix it.
>>
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        vring_desc_init_split(vr->desc, size);
>>> +    }
>>>
>>>      /*
>>>       * Disable device(host) interrupting guest
>>> @@ -386,7 +388,7 @@ virtio_init_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, 
>>> uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx)
>>>      /*
>>>       * Reserve a memzone for vring elements
>>>       */
>>> -    size = vring_size(vq_size, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>>> +    size = vring_size(hw, vq_size, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>>>      vq->vq_ring_size = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(size, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN);
>>>      PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vring_size: %d, rounded_vring_size: %d",
>>>               size, vq->vq_ring_size);
>>> @@ -489,7 +491,7 @@ virtio_init_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, 
>>> uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx)
>>>          for (i = 0; i < vq_size; i++) {
>>>              struct vring_desc *start_dp = txr[i].tx_indir;
>>>
>>> -            vring_desc_init(start_dp, RTE_DIM(txr[i].tx_indir));
>>> +            vring_desc_init_split(start_dp, RTE_DIM(txr[i].tx_indir));
>>>
>>>              /* first indirect descriptor is always the tx header */
>>>              start_dp->addr = txvq->virtio_net_hdr_mem
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h 
>>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>>> index 58fdd3d45..c487d2be0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct virtnet_ctl;
>>>
>>>  #define VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1        32
>>>  #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM    33
>>> +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED        34
>>>
>>>  /*
>>>   * Some VirtIO feature bits (currently bits 28 through 31) are
>>> @@ -314,6 +315,12 @@ vtpci_with_feature(struct virtio_hw *hw, 
>>> uint64_t bit)
>>>      return (hw->guest_features & (1ULL << bit)) != 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static inline int
>>> +vtpci_packed_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> +    return vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Function declaration from virtio_pci.c
>>>   */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ring.h 
>>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ring.h
>>> index 9e3c2a015..e65da100b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ring.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ring.h
>>> @@ -54,11 +54,38 @@ struct vring_used {
>>>      struct vring_used_elem ring[0];
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +/* For support of packed virtqueues in Virtio 1.1 the format of 
>>> descriptors
>>> + * looks like this.
>>> + */
>>> +struct vring_desc_packed {
>>> +    uint64_t addr;
>>> +    uint32_t len;
>>> +    uint16_t index;
>>
>> s/index/id/
> 
> ok
>>
>>> +    uint16_t flags;
>>> +} __attribute__ ((aligned(16)));
>>
>> We don't need the "__attribute__ ((aligned(16)))" in descriptor
>> structure's definition.
> 
> Someone requested this in an earlier round of reviews, but I'll
> check again.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define RING_EVENT_FLAGS_ENABLE 0x0
>>> +#define RING_EVENT_FLAGS_DISABLE 0x1
>>> +#define RING_EVENT_FLAGS_DESC 0x2
>>
>> Please add an empty line here.
> 
> ok
> 
>>
>>> +struct vring_packed_desc_event {
>>> +    uint16_t desc_event_off_wrap;
>>> +    uint16_t desc_event_flags;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  struct vring {
>>>      unsigned int num;
>>> -    struct vring_desc  *desc;
>>> -    struct vring_avail *avail;
>>> -    struct vring_used  *used;
>>> +    union {
>>> +        struct vring_desc_packed *desc_packed;
>>> +        struct vring_desc *desc;
>>> +    };
>>> +    union {
>>> +        struct vring_avail *avail;
>>> +        struct vring_packed_desc_event *driver_event;
>>> +    };
>>> +    union {
>>> +        struct vring_used  *used;
>>> +        struct vring_packed_desc_event *device_event;
>>> +    };
>>>  };
>>>
>>
>> We should define a new `vring` structure for packed ring.
> 
> I think it was requested to have it as a union before, but I can do
> it.

I guess oyu vcan have a union between struct vring and struct
vring_packed?

> Thanks for your review!
> 
> regards,
> Jens
>>
>> Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-24 14:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] net/virtio: vring init for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:21   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:48     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 13:51       ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2018-10-25 15:12         ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-26  6:01           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue defines Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:22   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 14:41     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue helpers Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:23   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 14:40     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] net/virtio: dump packed virtqueue data Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:25   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:54     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] net/virtio: implement transmit path for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 16:55   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-25 10:59     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:31   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:19     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 10:46   ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] net/virtio: implement receive " Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:39   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:54     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-26  5:43       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-31 12:46         ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 10:53   ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] net/virtio: add virtio send command packed queue support Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] net/virtio: enable packed virtqueues by default Jens Freimann
2018-10-26  6:06   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-11-02  8:58     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Tiwei Bie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=931e66a9-5f22-e241-0cbe-4640698543ec@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).