From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
"Wang, YuanX" <yuanx.wang@intel.com>,
"Ma, WenwuX" <wenwux.ma@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/14] vhost: improve IO vector logic
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:34:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93422eb2-fb3a-ab28-c112-34edb3da0499@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1e7b0ccdbad48188e8f5daf38323492@intel.com>
Hi,
On 10/12/21 08:05, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 6:00 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
>> <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Wang, YuanX <yuanx.wang@intel.com>; Ma,
>> WenwuX <wenwux.ma@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
>> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
>> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [RFC 08/14] vhost: improve IO vector logic
>>
>> IO vectors and their iterators arrays were part of the async metadata but not
>> their indexes.
>>
>> In order to makes this more consistent, the patch adds the indexes to the
>> async metadata. Doing that, we can avoid triggering DMA transfer within the
>> loop as it IO vector index overflow is now prevented in the
>> async_mbuf_to_desc() function.
>>
>> Note that previous detection mechanism was broken since the overflow
>> already happened when detected, so OOB memory access would already
>> have happened.
>>
>> With this changes done, virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split()
>> and virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_packed() can be further simplified.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> lib/vhost/vhost.h | 2 +
>> lib/vhost/virtio_net.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.h b/lib/vhost/vhost.h index
>> dae9a1ac2d..812d4c55a5 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.h
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
>> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct vhost_async {
>>
>> struct rte_vhost_iov_iter iov_iter[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT];
>> struct rte_vhost_iovec iovec[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC];
>> + uint16_t iter_idx;
>> + uint16_t iovec_idx;
>>
>> /* data transfer status */
>> struct async_inflight_info *pkts_info; diff --git a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c index ae7dded979..5ce4c14a73 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -924,33 +924,91 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
>> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> return error;
>> }
>>
>> +static __rte_always_inline int
>> +async_iter_initialize(struct vhost_async *async) {
>> + struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *iter;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(async->iter_idx >= VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT)) {
>> + VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "no more async iterators
>> available\n");
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>
> async->iter_idx will not exceed VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT, as virtio_dev_rx
> makes sure the number of packets to enqueue is less than or equal to
> MAX_PKT_BURST and it is the same as VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT.
Agree, this may not be necessary.
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(async->iovec_idx >= VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC)) {
>> + VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "no more async iovec available\n");
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> +
>> + iter = async->iov_iter + async->iter_idx;
>> + iter->iov = async->iovec + async->iovec_idx;
>> + iter->nr_segs = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __rte_always_inline int
>> +async_iter_add_iovec(struct vhost_async *async, void *src, void *dst,
>> +size_t len) {
>> + struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *iter;
>> + struct rte_vhost_iovec *iovec;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(async->iovec_idx >= VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC)) {
>> + VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "no more async iovec available\n");
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + iter = async->iov_iter + async->iter_idx;
>> + iovec = async->iovec + async->iovec_idx;
>
> async->iovec_idx is never gotten increased.
Good catch!
Thanks,
Maxime
> Thanks,
> Jiayu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 21:59 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] vhost: clean-up and simplify async implementation Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/14] vhost: move async data in a dedicated structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-14 3:24 ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-10-14 8:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/14] vhost: hide inflight async structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 03/14] vhost: simplify async IO vectors Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 04/14] vhost: simplify async IO vectors iterators Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 05/14] vhost: remove async batch threshold Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 06/14] vhost: introduce specific iovec structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/14] vhost: remove useless fields in async iterator struct Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/14] vhost: improve IO vector logic Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-12 6:05 ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-10-12 8:34 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/14] vhost: remove notion of async descriptor Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 10/14] vhost: simplify async enqueue completion Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 11/14] vhost: simplify getting the first in-flight index Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 12/14] vhost: prepare async for mbuf to desc refactoring Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 13/14] vhost: prepare sync " Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 14/14] vhost: merge sync and async mbuf to desc filling Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-08 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] vhost: clean-up and simplify async implementation David Marchand
2021-10-12 6:24 ` Hu, Jiayu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93422eb2-fb3a-ab28-c112-34edb3da0499@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=wenwux.ma@intel.com \
--cc=yuanx.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).