From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966AC902 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so94540405wib.1 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:03:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=X5Ptn6cnAsgm38nz9W9Gvcf2aPbNgyU2CpixyELC10U=; b=Y/hIBXykNssAcAtfl1jGs46SYFA7ng9UvP0dUpYeV6fCJUibrNbjHiheeCxwx4VpBd +36YbyJVNipb8drVIMt0qIPw2QauaINrRknvxGHdcmCfQd4UYZmj0Vgu8UfCeAagLOt5 nokPUytEd2V9UKjUX9x4uiOTRb5eS9FjEKZpldvXNoAlSMzgLa9erIOwNFqH0JzqVLw+ KC8lCx2vsRzDAo6xU7sgFmIX1khFJH3exUOKEe+dqkrvhEoAqitOnVUILE9dw2+A8sOk ufiXRT3AScFHuphtGmbvx0GBEnRvMdesN3gquIRPw9K6n2wMFLBIvsfB2oB5OtQ10yco lhZg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaWggPEvIVRWe3EsMx3dI45u7+YdsCePGW+E0rHGcIJyrxR7bNlUMODPDNfVoQ1EyPWgYg X-Received: by 10.194.184.140 with SMTP id eu12mr18774336wjc.78.1435914218491; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm12861607wic.2.2015.07.03.02.03.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:03:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:02:28 +0200 Message-ID: <9388529.0Xl0Ea6jym@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <559644F5.8050506@intel.com> References: <1433586732-28217-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13> <559644F5.8050506@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:03:38 -0000 2015-07-03 09:16, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio: > On 02/07/2015 13:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/* > >> F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/* > >> F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/ > >> F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > >> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst > >> F: app/test/test_alarm.c > >> F: app/test/test_atomic.c > >> F: app/test/test_byteorder.c > >> @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c > >> F: app/test/test_string_fns.c > >> F: app/test/test_tailq.c > >> F: app/test/test_version.c > >> +F: app/test/test_malloc.c > >> +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > > I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator > > in EAL. I suggest this: > > > > Memory allocation > > M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy > > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem* > > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h > > F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc* > > F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem* > > F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst > > F: app/test/test_malloc.c > > F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > > > > > Fine with me. > Do you need a new version of the patches with that change? Yes please. Thanks for your involvement.