DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx instability with vector mode
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 01:48:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013CD0DFE0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611532DBD72@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:42 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx instability with vector
> mode
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:47 AM
> > To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx instability with
> > vector mode
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > >
> > > Previously, there is instability during vector Rx if descriptor
> > > number is not power of 2, e.g. process hang and some Rx packets are
> > > unexpectedly empty. That's because vector Rx mode assumes Rx
> > > descriptor number is power of 2 when doing bit mask.
> > > This patch allows vector mode only when the number of Rx descriptor
> > > is power of 2.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8e109464c022 ("i40e: allow vector Rx and Tx usage")
> > > Fixes: a3c83a2527e1 ("net/i40e: enable runtime queue setup")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2 changes:
> > >  - rx_vec_allowed is global configuration, avoid overwrite.
> > >
> > >  doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst     |  7 +++++++
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> > > index
> > > ab3928a..bfacbd1 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> > > @@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ Runtime Config Options
> > >
> > >    -w 84:00.0,use-latest-supported-vec=1
> > >
> > > +Vector RX Pre-conditions
> > > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > +For Vector RX it is assumed that the number of descriptor rings
> > > +will be a power of 2. With this pre-condition, the ring pointer can
> > > +easily scroll back to the head after hitting the tail without a
> > > +conditional check. In addition Vector RX can use this assumption to
> > > +do a bit mask
> > using ``ring_size - 1``.
> > > +
> > >  Driver compilation and testing
> > >  ------------------------------
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index a827456..f6dcca0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -1735,10 +1735,14 @@ i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup_runtime(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > >  		 * i40e_set_rx_function.
> > >  		 */
> > >  		ad->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed = true;
> > > -		ad->rx_vec_allowed = true;
> > >  		dev->data->scattered_rx = use_scattered_rx;
> > >  		if (use_def_burst_func)
> > >  			ad->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed = false;
> > > +		/**
> > > +		 * Vector mode is allowed only when number of Rx queue
> > > +		 * descriptor is a power of 2.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		ad->rx_vec_allowed = !(rxq->nb_rx_desc & (rxq->nb_rx_desc -
> 1));
> > >  		i40e_set_rx_function(dev);
> > >  		return 0;
> > >  	}
> >
> > I think this is not complete - if it is not  the first function, we have to do:
> > If (if (ad->rx_vec_allowed && (rxq->nb_rx_desc & (rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1)
> > != 0) {
> >       PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, ...);
> >        return -EINVAL;
> > }
> 
> Yes, we should prevent downgrade if the device is already running.

OK, will update in next version.

> 
> >
> > BTW, here and below why not to use rte_is_power_of_2()?

Thanks for the reminder, will use the inline function in next version.


> > Konstantin
> >
> > > @@ -1811,6 +1815,13 @@ i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct
> rte_eth_dev
> > *dev,
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > +	/**
> > > +	 * Vector mode is allowed only when number of Rx queue
> > > +	 * descriptor is a power of 2.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (ad->rx_vec_allowed)
> > > +		ad->rx_vec_allowed = !(nb_desc & (nb_desc - 1));
> 
> Looks like we are not able to get back to vec mode once some queue is set
> to no power of 2, even if all queues has been re-setup to power of 2 again.
> Seems we still need to check all other queue's configure here.

We can allow vector again when runtime configuring the first queue whose descriptor number is power of 2, right?

> 
> > > +
> > >  	/* Free memory if needed */
> > >  	if (dev->data->rx_queues[queue_idx]) {
> > >
> 	i40e_dev_rx_queue_release(dev->data->rx_queues[queue_idx]);
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-25  7:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Beilei Xing
2018-10-25 16:47 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-10-26  6:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Beilei Xing
2018-10-26  8:47   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-10-26 15:41     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-10-29  1:48       ` Xing, Beilei [this message]
2018-10-26 11:11   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-10-26 15:49     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-11-01  5:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Beilei Xing
2018-11-01 11:48     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-11-01 13:13       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-11-05  3:18     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Beilei Xing
2018-11-05 11:05       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-11-05 15:53         ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013CD0DFE0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).