DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>
Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"harry.van.haaren@intel.com" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] use GCC's C11 atomic builtins for test
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:44:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9457012.R7DUN0BsNp@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR08MB6935A381618F164F717BA72292149@AS8PR08MB6935.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

13/07/2021 09:28, Joyce Kong:
> Hi David,
> 
> Since we have some discussion about the atomic operations now, I changed the commit message from "C11 atomics"(which has been widely used in previous commit) to "GCC atomic built-ins".
> What's your opinion about whether keeping the previous message for the consistency or using the new description?

Given clang adopted the same syntax as GCC,
I prefer "compiler atomic builtins".



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04  9:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/8] test/ticketlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/8] test/spinlock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/8] test/rwlock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/8] test/mcslock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/8] test/mempool: remove unused variable " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/8] test/mempool_perf: use GCC atomic builtins " Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 7/8] test/service_cores: use GCC atomic builtins for lock sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-04  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 8/8] test/rcu_perf: use GCC atomic builtins for data sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-04 19:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/8] use GCC's C11 atomic builtins for test Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-11  8:40 ` David Marchand
2021-06-11 10:45   ` Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] test/ticketlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] test/spinlock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] test/rwlock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] test/mcslock: " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] test/mempool: remove unused variable " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] test/mempool_perf: use GCC atomic builtins " Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] test/service_cores: use GCC atomic builtins for lock sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-16  2:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] test/rcu: use GCC atomic builtins for data sync Joyce Kong
2021-06-17 15:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] use GCC's C11 atomic builtins for test Tyler Retzlaff
2021-06-17 23:26     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-23 10:24       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-23 16:02         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-06-29 17:04         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-30 18:51           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-06-30 19:06             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-30 19:38               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-06-30 20:25                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-30 21:49                   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-06-30 22:41                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-07-13  7:28                       ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-14 11:44                         ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-07-20  3:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] use compiler " Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] test/ticketlock: use compiler atomics for lcores sync Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] test/spinlock: use compile " Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] test/rwlock: use compiler " Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] test/mcslock: " Joyce Kong
2021-07-28  9:56       ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-29  7:19         ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-29  7:58           ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] test/mempool: remove unused variable " Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] test/mempool_perf: use compiler atomics " Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] test/service_cores: use compiler atomics for lock sync Joyce Kong
2021-07-20  3:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] test/rcu: use compiler atomics for data sync Joyce Kong
2021-07-23 19:52       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-28  7:07         ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-30 21:58     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] use compiler atomic builtins for test Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9457012.R7DUN0BsNp@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Joyce.Kong@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).