From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3135A0524; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FC7160BBB; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BB0160BA2 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79B15C015B; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:23:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:23:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= 5oRCWyFctgjDy+7s1+IaxNIavKYGSOcoIkIn52QcHhU=; b=2hE3R2rW9X9RRz08 a0TJ8YDICTm4VyugTaexa9LGuYYyC8zYb1uVB3OeCrk4eJaRSXmklhfa6G2VN+ws vGwWa5ZW5YjxodVIW9OXWHH+o1/EHgO69ppuA0LeMqmZ7MGD5s/8AFRl9xjS8JIG 1J3e0KGYNqdcUTUu223+n02lIPo9TpEG2PZRRjWsEEaj92XKkEqqjAQWg3Nzoojt kqJ6SyAn2e0CJbIDM0te1RS9fyc/Ps9QpVtP92klz5szt15Q6r+VFDFE9SwGr4Ci hw65pRNn/OfB/TEjBAgL4nwxXawBfGR9uPldjlDnfvaUH0ToATAZlTAlwUJcgsTx ydc4YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=5oRCWyFctgjDy+7s1+IaxNIavKYGSOcoIkIn52QcH hU=; b=JA4oUu23WktRIS/gr1UReIg7+MN1qJbuUJcy+OieuFePGbZk6MK+dyaPq MLC2eTjV3zV0lBjSNxip6Ecw2DRSQ8Z2D+sQ+5qlSqRyZX886A3CkCqzc8zjp3PE 9Y4YHQyE0J5q1a0+kuwo6se6BgsalWCgB6iY4jh2wy4l37wHl0IR8Z21TDDN5B5I HvfUN79Z+IX3SYo8DmNp47HNAEpSri6We5DsWbbQp/aMjg9IBDT5qHhcgHKziNlx TFpl+ib+s/QyVoMUf/DJQk6ZX/lW/mP96AVLnm5R7YOozWi47HUfoRvrrDLY0TuD Tg3JDam2ulsEzkrwtEScAEwFc0eZw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudekkedguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0059224006A; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:23:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit , Bing Zhao Cc: Ori Kam , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" , Matan Azrad , Slava Ovsiienko , dev@dpdk.org, "ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" , Gregory Etelson , Andrey Vesnovaty Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:23:55 +0200 Message-ID: <9464926.GqKepWMSnl@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1617940481-125528-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com> <6a3f87b5-2b30-3f8c-7a31-c55eeaa0a834@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Change shared action API to action handle API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 13/04/2021 03:22, Bing Zhao: > From: Ferruh Yigit > > > Bing Zhao (4): > > > ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs > > > app/test-pmd: change to indirect action command > > > doc: update user guide for indirect action > > > net/mlx5: adaption to indirect action API > > > > > > > Hi Bing, > > > > How the patchset constructed will cause build error in patch by > > patch build, since first patch removes some struct/functions that > > are in use. > > > > One way to handle this is: > > - first add new function/structs > > - switch app & pmd to new function/structs > > - remove old function/structs > > Sure, I will reorganize the patch set in this way. Thanks for this. This is a drop-in replacement, it should be done in one patch only.