From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6A3A0547; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35316419EC; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C134419D3; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A555C0072; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:41:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= U8cImusjzZwMREJ4kIRv7W8btRCseBnctfUiofLPGck=; b=zmmLWfT+Ory71Rac 5IdZTayTU2Pia1BMQwEsbulpCj3F/4ToIt/Ji+Pc0ulPP04O6rvXcEOHJ0xgDQLz hu6VABm12DmmYNyQ7EcuYVBWoIWNvwtoVFVMRQuxDkoi2NMNftYn/+mTNWARLr3i e8ms53DAw6WC4u14UlWiBEGVkbhsv2QA8M5HQjlnF7agMfk+AZ2Sq+JKjkQC3Na/ TrDZgVkJnWeKTK4ikH+s/vTAFwbsdlkP93/RSVkNhQfykASIwtMQ2WfFdJb0ZI+a LgBwHarpkeZ6PSsv+IQydH9Tcmy//XYG4WUwDwN734es0mRV4ayHvThHei6lh9WM VtkMtw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=U8cImusjzZwMREJ4kIRv7W8btRCseBnctfUiofLPG ck=; b=p+IikQ8Bygn/XAzYWLkgRVl5l77oaDlJ/quR9BVyxWeZj+p5Rd2rugYKW S2Zqctci2nFomPNB9A1/aTLhxS79KmA74rxML92W/CyeAt4zncA8NC/ttV2P7HfU dvbAr2kQrWVY6VhqXvqA928+GEd0o1jRkbDsRE1WgwN80Jpr/Dta1tv5nAn3RzZl R2fZMmYNLinQhU7+tH3LZ+mQZCSOcptHv1r7An6ariQwhsRZVYLDgvZ2shIXYiuD R8JHIwkytRAOIyRLWO2dUScl5RPd4+rSRZCxLfNq/xMHGbk5Bdq0oJNWQXPmozAQ obzERDUt3SnbCoC6kZ8z2BKhbOsQQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtkedgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D3F8F240066; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:41:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ali Alnubani Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, aconole@redhat.com, ci@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: <9470563.utI7u1ruXk@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210421100638.19451-1-alialnu@nvidia.com> References: <20210421100638.19451-1-alialnu@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pipeline: fix build with gcc 4.8.5 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 21/04/2021 12:06, Ali Alnubani: > Compilation on CentOS 7 with gcc version 4.8.5 fails with > the following errors: > ``` > ... > error: 'src_struct_id' may be used uninitialized in this > function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > ... > error: 'dst_struct_id' may be used uninitialized in this > function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > ... > ``` > > This patch fixes the build errors by initializing both variables. > > Bugzilla ID: 683 > Fixes: 783768136f29 ("pipeline: auto-detect endianness of action arguments") > Cc: cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com This patch was depending on others so CI didn't run. I've requested a partial CI run when dependencies resolved and it passed. That's what happens when I merge a patch without a re-run of the full CI. We really need to be able to re-run CI easily, plus managing the dependencies in the CI. > Signed-off-by: Ali Alnubani Applied, thanks