From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ILCAS1.corp.radware.com (mailout1.radware.com [192.115.180.130]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDABC5A49 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 17:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ILMB1.corp.radware.com ([169.254.1.153]) by ILCAS1.corp.radware.com ([176.200.120.121]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 14 May 2015 18:48:31 +0300 From: Nissim Nisimov To: "Zhang, Helin" Thread-Topic: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment Thread-Index: AQHQiNQ/xilfK9NqzkGx1SGsGrsiU511okEQgABoB4CAAB19f4AB57dQgAOZaLA= Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:48:30 +0000 Message-ID: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642442ADF@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> References: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD906423BDF6F@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642428A41@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642432170@ILMB1.corp.radware.com>, 5899d592-8c87-47d9-92b6-d34260ce1aa4@radware.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [176.200.120.205] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:48:33 -0000 Hi Helin, Any news regarding this issue? do u know if there is any related patch I ca= n apply on my application in order to work with multi-segment packets? Thanks, Nissim -----Original Message----- From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 11:51 AM To: Nissim Nisimov Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org' Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment Hi Nissim It seems that our validation guys here can reproduce it in our lab. I will = check that soon later, and update you later. Thank you very much for the good finding! Regards, Helin > -----Original Message----- > From: Nissim Nisimov [mailto:NissimN@Radware.com] > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:44 AM > To: Zhang, Helin > Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org' > Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I am using PF pass-through and it doesn't work even with 2000 bytes of=20 > server response page size. > Looks like the first segment of each session is not received. >=20 > When i am changing the server response size to 1000 bytes, all works=20 > as expected. >=20 > I am working with dpdk 1.8 version. >=20 > Any idea why ? Is it related to i40e multi segment support? >=20 > Thx > Nissim >=20 > On May 11, 2015 5:03 AM, "Zhang, Helin" > wrote: > > > > Hi Nissim > > > > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through? > > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix. > > For VF pass-through, there is >=20 > Hi Nissim >=20 > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through? > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix. > For VF pass-through, there is a bug fix which is needed for supporting=20 > jumbo frame and multiple mbuf. > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4641/ >=20 >=20 > Regards, > Helin >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim Nisimov > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:48 AM > > To: Nissim Nisimov; 'dev@dpdk.org' > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with=20 > > multi-segment > > > > Hi, > > > > can someone assist regarding this issue? > > > > Is it a known limitation in i40e/dpdk (no support for multi-segment)? > > > > Thx > > Nissim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim Nisimov > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:44 PM > > To: 'dev@dpdk.org' > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am trying to work with Intel Fortville (XL710) NICs in Passthrough=20 > > mode from a VM running dpdk app. > > > > > > First I didn't have any TX traffic from the VM, I got dpdk patch for=20 > > this issue and it fixed it. > > (http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4588/) > > > > But now I see that when trying to run multi-segment traffic not all=20 > > the packets reaching the VM (I tested it on bare metal as well and=20 > > saw the same issue) > > > > Is it a known issue? any workaround for it? > > > > Thanks, > > Nissim