DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nissim Nisimov <NissimN@Radware.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:51:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642452A01@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A86C2F1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Thx!

We will check it in our code

Nissim

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 6:54 AM
To: Nissim Nisimov
Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org'
Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment

Hi Nissim

Sorry for late reply!
Today I got a ready environment, and tried the latest DPDK code (on master branch) on my environment, it works well.
So could you help to try the latest code (R2.0 +) on your environment again, to see if the issue is still there or not?

Regards,
Helin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:51 PM
> To: Nissim Nisimov
> Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org'
> Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment
> 
> Hi Nissim
> 
> It seems that our validation guys here can reproduce it in our lab. I 
> will check that soon later, and update you later.
> Thank you very much for the good finding!
> 
> Regards,
> Helin
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nissim Nisimov [mailto:NissimN@Radware.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:44 AM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org'
> > Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using PF pass-through and it doesn't work even with 2000 bytes 
> > of server response page size.
> > Looks like the first segment of each session is not received.
> >
> > When i am changing the server response size to 1000 bytes, all works 
> > as expected.
> >
> > I am working with dpdk 1.8 version.
> >
> > Any idea why ? Is it related to i40e multi segment support?
> >
> > Thx
> > Nissim
> >
> > On May 11, 2015 5:03 AM, "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Nissim
> > >
> > > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through?
> > > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix.
> > > For VF pass-through, there is
> >
> > Hi Nissim
> >
> > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through?
> > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix.
> > For VF pass-through, there is a bug fix which is needed for 
> > supporting jumbo frame and multiple mbuf.
> > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4641/
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Helin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim
> Nisimov
> > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:48 AM
> > > To: Nissim Nisimov; 'dev@dpdk.org'
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with 
> > > multi-segment
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can someone assist regarding this issue?
> > >
> > > Is it a known limitation in i40e/dpdk (no support for multi-segment)?
> > >
> > > Thx
> > > Nissim
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim
> Nisimov
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:44 PM
> > > To: 'dev@dpdk.org'
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am trying to work with Intel Fortville (XL710) NICs in 
> > > Passthrough mode from a VM running dpdk app.
> > >
> > >
> > > First I didn't have any TX traffic from the VM, I got dpdk patch 
> > > for this issue and it fixed it.
> > > (http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4588/)
> > >
> > > But now I see that when trying to run multi-segment traffic not 
> > > all the packets reaching the VM (I tested it on bare metal as well 
> > > and saw the same issue)
> > >
> > > Is it a known issue? any workaround for it?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nissim

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-19 17:58 [dpdk-dev] Queries on DPDK working with XL710 intel NIC Nissim Nisimov
2015-03-20 14:55 ` Nissim Nisimov
2015-03-20 15:30   ` Roberts, Lee A.
2015-04-02 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] calling rte_eth_rx_queue_setup from secondary processes Nissim Nisimov
2015-05-07 14:43 ` [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment Nissim Nisimov
2015-05-10 19:48   ` Nissim Nisimov
2015-05-11  2:02     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-05-11  3:43       ` Nissim Nisimov
2015-05-12  8:50       ` Zhang, Helin
2015-05-14 15:48         ` Nissim Nisimov
2015-05-27  3:54         ` Zhang, Helin
2015-05-28 17:51           ` Nissim Nisimov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642452A01@ILMB1.corp.radware.com \
    --to=nissimn@radware.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).