From: Roman Dementiev <roman.dementiev@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] add support for HTM lock elision for x86
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 17:12:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95133134.20150605171212@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150603114014.7f1fb67a@urahara>
Hello Stephen,
Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 8:40:14 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:11:30 +0200
> Roman Dementiev <roman.dementiev@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> This series of patches adds methods that use hardware memory transactions (HTM)
>> on fast-path for DPDK locks (a.k.a. lock elision). Here the methods are implemented
>> for x86 using Restricted Transactional Memory instructions (Intel(r) Transactional
>> Synchronization Extensions). The implementation fall-backs to the normal DPDK lock
>> if HTM is not available or memory transactions fail.
>> This is not a replacement for all lock usages since not all critical sections protected
>> by locks are friendly to HTM.
>>
> You probably want to put a caveat around this, it won't work for people
> that expect to use spinlocks to protect I/O operations on hardware.
> Since I/O operations aren't like memory.
yes, I/O can not be rolled back by the CPU if the transaction should fail. Thus
the HTM transaction protecting I/O operations are always aborted by
CPU. In Intel TSX the I/O operations (MMIO, outp, etc) are TSX-unfriendly
causing immediate abort.
--
Best regards,
Roman mailto:roman.dementiev@intel.com
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-02 13:11 Roman Dementiev
2015-06-02 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] spinlock: " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-02 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] rwlock: " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-02 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test scaling of HTM lock elision protecting rte_hash Roman Dementiev
[not found] ` <CADNuJVpeKa9-R7WHkoCzw82vpYd=3XmhOoz2JfGsFLzDW+F5UQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-02 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] add support for HTM lock elision for x86 Dementiev, Roman
2015-06-02 14:55 ` Roman Dementiev
2015-06-03 18:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-06-05 15:12 ` Roman Dementiev [this message]
2015-06-16 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-16 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] spinlock: " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-17 21:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-18 10:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-06-19 13:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-22 15:32 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2015-06-29 9:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix cpu_feature_table[] compilation with -pedantic Adrien Mazarguil
2015-06-29 12:10 ` David Marchand
2015-06-29 12:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-16 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] rwlock: add support for HTM lock elision for x86 Roman Dementiev
2015-06-16 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] test scaling of HTM lock elision protecting rte_hash Roman Dementiev
2015-06-17 13:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] add support for HTM lock elision for x86 Bruce Richardson
2015-06-17 13:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-17 13:48 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-06-19 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-19 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] spinlock: " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-19 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] rwlock: " Roman Dementiev
2015-06-19 11:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test scaling of HTM lock elision protecting rte_hash Roman Dementiev
2015-06-19 14:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add support for HTM lock elision for x86 Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-02 13:17 [dpdk-dev] " Dementiev, Roman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95133134.20150605171212@intel.com \
--to=roman.dementiev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).