From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB72A04D8;
	Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E211DA86;
	Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57DD1D70E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:18:58 +0200 (CEST)
IronPort-SDR: ZGVXx24kx7HmS2XdhS8MJqOwiwO10uzKRJ5okHvG2iLFnWrvCN8mATana82Tq3pECsqBTySlR0
 mgDHBZ3gyz9w==
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9750"; a="161305723"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,286,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="161305723"
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 21 Sep 2020 07:18:53 -0700
IronPort-SDR: H9kuIJx4PLo36tYYDQ0SXOCdiqZeg7vk/C96vvO84/bSSTAdz50lqUxoxIezSw2Au+vdOmJzU/
 EBx5lQXszmlA==
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,286,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="309050549"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.217.64])
 ([10.213.217.64])
 by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 21 Sep 2020 07:18:51 -0700
To: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, thomas@monjalon.net, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
 wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, maryam.tahhan@intel.com
References: <1592483709-7076-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com>
 <1600694558-19120-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com>
 <1600694558-19120-2-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <962447d5-b23f-f947-fa70-57ee8cd28bfa@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:18:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1600694558-19120-2-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: add a field for rxq info
 structure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 9/21/2020 2:22 PM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
> size used in receiving packets for HW.
> 
> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by calling
> rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>