From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A41A052A; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:50:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A608D1DE7C; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5911C1DE76 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:50:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4831364; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:50:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:50:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= QsPj5Q7tRK237dkW4Mse4s+R2clG+SpWg7mu2qiZL+0=; b=ZaksMPwVy1pdrt3z tzLnOTE1wxZQMU/4KCuF7O1dP/3Bk0qPgDcauzVa5kEpW50lwBAmU+kVmxmPUPM+ 2BexSgYdlZcpQPhf7FaIfwNrH8VUPSH4TeA7FOoPoFo+ra3pXFnaBdc7+gXYWttg tI2EtDXliogW0CcohnVTdGh7zUGjxak0tdFlh0nGCMA0+l5J45hmu81Q3U5L3ZfN 9a7vfed2jP3juA2GEQXYJCZTRAcEUARxo3XnpVqlQUk0qvCfscr/wBslB9kw1KDH QOiZmppq1kSEiv1JuXSvWEmXbfB09tPiQA26u4tKBa0m7Ix7tzD1NyCANx31DOId cRAstw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=QsPj5Q7tRK237dkW4Mse4s+R2clG+SpWg7mu2qiZL +0=; b=C+5zOuIEWb92Q7mDcNS9bCEVZW64APQoQQS3z7qzN2a5UAOf5GPUNxLBj obX8XyV7nJYIYrEdhTPJ4nahtIhBavHjhHW1W6YiTKUJCgeFCYh88ar662Kt6vsC dbBZ8WHY54kjNPdgG7vr1MEQBrk9fA9sxd/MXd48uo8iYR3UGImpWcCPDNICFuXn ivTMqjbfEDCPncArI8//8gQ4PUUOQjQFsTTKk7Xh+trj/QBKmeCGLnmzArKs2ooD z3bov12iOilip2/WhiLCOmYIp8A9MrCr9k+Pp/Piy4fX2qtsLhudo5KtRX28zTmd yABRSOeEcAs/1/vBdTQjCx6FZ+SFw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrvddugdduheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D806328005D; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:50:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ciara Power Cc: dev@dpdk.org, kevin.laatz@intel.com, Stephen Hemminger , bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <9665425.xVsip7n7Xm@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200518170704.63491d4b@hermes.lan> References: <20200518161232.58952-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20200518170704.63491d4b@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20.08] telemetry: add upper limit on connections X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/05/2020 02:07, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 18 May 2020 17:12:32 +0100 > Ciara Power wrote: > > > This patch limits the number of client connections to the new telemetry > > socket. The limit is set at 10. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Power > > The upper limit is fine, but using System V semaphores is not a good > way to do this. Please consider using some other atomic primitive. Why no reply?