DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Stojaczyk, Dariusz" <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] dev: don't fail the hotplug request if device is attached in secondary
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 13:28:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9706776.xTluRg8pfR@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611532EA1B2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

> > Consider the following scenario:
> > 
> >  1) primary process (A) starts, probes the bus
> >  2) a secondary process (B) starts, probes the bus
> >  3) yet another secondary process (C) starts
> >  4) (C) registers the pci driver and hotplugs the device
> >     * an IPC attach req is sent to the primary (A)
> >       * (A) ignores the -EEXIST from process-local probe
> >       * (A) propagates the request to all secondary processes
> >         * (B) responds with -EEXIST
> >       * (A) replies to the original request with the -EEXIST
> >         return code
> >     * the -EEXIST is returned back to the user, although the
> >       device was successfully attached both locally and in
> >       all other processes
> > 
> > This patch makes the primary process reply with rc=0 even if there was another
> > secondary process with the device already attached. The primary process
> > already didn't reply with -EEXIST when the device was attached locally, so now
> > this behavior is even more consistent. Looking by the code, this seems to be the
> > originally intended behavior.
> > 
> > Fixes: ac9e4a17370f ("eal: support attach/detach shared device from
> > secondary")
> > Cc: qi.z.zhang@intel.com
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>

Applied, thanks

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-25 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-23 14:58 Darek Stojaczyk
2018-11-23 18:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-11-25 12:28   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9706776.xTluRg8pfR@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).