From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Cc: <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 12:28:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98560bb8-605d-3ef9-3115-039776c35866@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcc7104e-9b16-4c88-a836-92bad98017e6@amd.com>
在 2023/11/11 11:37, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 11/10/2023 8:19 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> Currently, there are two conditions to set tunnel TSO, like "parse tunnel"
>> and "outer IP checksum". If these conditions are not satisfied, testpmd
>> should not change their configuration, like tx_offloads on port and per
>> queue, and no need to request "reconfig device".
>>
>> Fixes: 597f9fafe13b ("app/testpmd: convert to new Tx offloads API")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index d3243d016b..33e66d1d93 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -5093,17 +5093,6 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> res->port_id);
>> return;
>> }
>> - check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz == 0) {
>> - ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &= ~all_tunnel_tso;
>> - printf("TSO for tunneled packets is disabled\n");
>> - } else {
>> - ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=
>> - (all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> - printf("TSO segment size for tunneled packets is %d\n",
>> - ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz);
>>
>> /* Below conditions are needed to make it work:
>> * (1) tunnel TSO is supported by the NIC;
>> @@ -5116,14 +5105,29 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> * is not necessary for IPv6 tunneled pkts because there's no
>> * checksum in IP header anymore.
>> */
>> -
>> - if (!ports[res->port_id].parse_tunnel)
>> + if (!ports[res->port_id].parse_tunnel) {
>> fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: csum parse_tunnel must be set so that tunneled packets are recognized\n");
>> + "Error: csum parse_tunnel must be set so that tunneled packets are recognized\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> if (!(ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM))
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM)) {
>> fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: csum set outer-ip must be set to hw if outer L3 is IPv4; not necessary for IPv6\n");
>> + "Error: csum set outer-ip must be set to hw if outer L3 is IPv4; not necessary for IPv6\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz == 0) {
>> + ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &= ~all_tunnel_tso;
>> + printf("TSO for tunneled packets is disabled\n");
>> + } else {
>> + ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=
>> + (all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + printf("TSO segment size for tunneled packets is %d\n",
>> + ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz);
>>
> Similar comment with previous patch, why having separate if block for
> same check, above block can be merged to it.
Ack
>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-11 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 8:19 [PATCH v1 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Huisong Li
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] app/testpmd: fix random value " Huisong Li
2023-11-10 11:42 ` Ivan Malov
2023-11-11 1:17 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-11 3:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] app/testpmd: add the explicit check for tunnel TSO offload Huisong Li
2023-11-11 3:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-11 4:27 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO Huisong Li
2023-11-11 3:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-11 4:28 ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] app/testpmd: fix random value " Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: add the explicit check for tunnel TSO offload Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO Huisong Li
2023-11-11 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98560bb8-605d-3ef9-3115-039776c35866@huawei.com \
--to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).