DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] eal: add bus cleanup to eal cleanup
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 10:07:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <986821ef-54f6-a2c7-bc98-6d89cbc09d41@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603143601.230519-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com>


在 2022/6/3 22:36, Kevin Laatz 写道:
> During EAL init, all buses are probed and the devices found are
> initialized. On eal_cleanup(), the inverse does not happen, meaning any
> allocated memory and other configuration will not be cleaned up
> appropriately on exit.
>
> Currently, in order for device cleanup to take place, applications must
> call the driver-relevant functions to ensure proper cleanup is done before
> the application exits. Since initialization occurs for all devices on the
> bus, not just the devices used by an application, it requires a)
> application awareness of all bus devices that could have been probed on the
> system, and b) code duplication across applications to ensure cleanup is
> performed. An example of this is rte_eth_dev_close() which is commonly used
> across the example applications.
>
> This patch proposes adding bus cleanup to the eal_cleanup() to make EAL's
> init/exit more symmetrical, ensuring all bus devices are cleaned up
> appropriately without the application needing to be aware of all bus types
> that may have been probed during initialization.
>
> Contained in this patch are the changes required to perform cleanup for
> devices on the PCI bus and VDEV bus during eal_cleanup(). There would be an
> ask for bus maintainers to add the relevant cleanup for their buses since
> they have the domain expertise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>
> ---
> v7:
> * free rte_pci_device structs during cleanup
> * free rte_vdev_device structs during cleanup
>
> v6:
> * fix units in doc API descriptions
>
> v5:
> * add doc updates for new APIs
>
> v4:
> * fix return value when scaling_freq_max is not set
> * fix mismatching comments
>
> v3:
> * move setters from arg parse function to init
> * consider 0 as 'not set' for scaling_freq_max
> * other minor fixes
>
> v2:
> * add doc update for l3fwd-power
> * order version.map additions alphabetically
> ---
>   devtools/libabigail.abignore    |  9 +++++++++
>   drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   lib/eal/common/eal_private.h    | 10 ++++++++++
>   lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c           |  1 +
>   lib/eal/include/rte_bus.h       | 13 +++++++++++++
>   lib/eal/linux/eal.c             |  1 +
>   lib/eal/windows/eal.c           |  1 +
>   9 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> index 79ff15dc4e..3e519ee42a 100644
> --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> @@ -56,3 +56,12 @@
>   ; Ignore libabigail false-positive in clang builds, after moving code.
>   [suppress_function]
>   	name = rte_eal_remote_launch
> +
> +; Ignore field inserted to rte_bus, adding cleanup function
> +[suppress_type]
> +        name = rte_bus
> +        has_data_member_inserted_at = end
> +
> +; Ignore changes to internally used structs containing rte_bus
> +[suppress_type]
> +        name = rte_pci_bus, rte_vmbus_bus, rte_vdev_bus
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> index 37ab879779..75b312eef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>   #include <rte_common.h>
>   #include <rte_devargs.h>
>   #include <rte_vfio.h>
> +#include <rte_tailq.h>
>   
>   #include "private.h"
>   
> @@ -394,6 +395,30 @@ pci_probe(void)
>   	return (probed && probed == failed) ? -1 : 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +pci_cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_pci_device *dev, *tmp_dev;
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	RTE_TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(dev, &rte_pci_bus.device_list, next, tmp_dev) {
> +		struct rte_pci_driver *drv = dev->driver;
> +		int ret = 0;
> +
> +		if (drv == NULL || drv->remove == NULL)
> +			continue;
It seems that 'dev->driver' still points to the 'rte_pci_driver' or 
'rte_vdev_driver'
if the device has been closed by 'dev_close()'. Logically, there is a 
risk of removing
a device twice. Do you want to guarantee through the 'remove()' API itself?
> +
> +		ret = drv->remove(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			rte_errno = errno;
> +			error = -1;
> +		}
> +		free(dev);
Can I use the 'local_dev_remove()' to remove the device and 
rte_pci/vdev_device on the bus?
Because there may be other resources that need to be released, like, 
some release operations
in the 'rte_pci_detach_dev()'.
> +	}
> +
> +	return error;
> +}
> +
>   /* dump one device */
>   static int
>   pci_dump_one_device(FILE *f, struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> @@ -813,6 +838,7 @@ struct rte_pci_bus rte_pci_bus = {
>   	.bus = {
>   		.scan = rte_pci_scan,
>   		.probe = pci_probe,
> +		.cleanup = pci_cleanup,
>   		.find_device = pci_find_device,
>   		.plug = pci_plug,
>   		.unplug = pci_unplug,
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> index a8d8b2327e..707ea1bbb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> @@ -569,6 +569,31 @@ vdev_probe(void)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +vdev_cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_vdev_device *dev, *tmp_dev;
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	RTE_TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(dev, &vdev_device_list, next, tmp_dev) {
> +		const struct rte_vdev_driver *drv;
> +		int ret = 0;
> +
> +		drv = container_of(dev->device.driver, const struct rte_vdev_driver, driver);
> +
> +		if (drv == NULL || drv->remove == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = drv->remove(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			error = -1;
> +
> +		free(dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	return error;
> +}
> +
>   struct rte_device *
>   rte_vdev_find_device(const struct rte_device *start, rte_dev_cmp_t cmp,
>   		     const void *data)
> @@ -627,6 +652,7 @@ vdev_get_iommu_class(void)
>   static struct rte_bus rte_vdev_bus = {
>   	.scan = vdev_scan,
>   	.probe = vdev_probe,
> +	.cleanup = vdev_cleanup,
>   	.find_device = rte_vdev_find_device,
>   	.plug = vdev_plug,
>   	.unplug = vdev_unplug,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> index baa5b532af..3fe67af0ba 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,23 @@ rte_bus_probe(void)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/* Clean up all devices of all buses */
> +int
> +eal_bus_cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct rte_bus *bus;
> +
> +	TAILQ_FOREACH(bus, &rte_bus_list, next) {
> +		if (bus->cleanup == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +		if (bus->cleanup() != 0)
> +			ret = -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /* Dump information of a single bus */
>   static int
>   bus_dump_one(FILE *f, struct rte_bus *bus)
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h b/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> index 44d14241f0..eea4749af4 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> @@ -441,6 +441,16 @@ int rte_eal_memory_detach(void);
>    */
>   struct rte_bus *rte_bus_find_by_device_name(const char *str);
>   
> +/**
> + * For each device on the buses, call the driver-specific function for
> + * device cleanup.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 0 for successful cleanup
> + * !0 otherwise
> + */
> +int eal_bus_cleanup(void);
> +
>   /**
>    * Create the unix channel for primary/secondary communication.
>    *
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> index a6b20960f2..97ed2c4678 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> @@ -893,6 +893,7 @@ rte_eal_cleanup(void)
>   		eal_get_internal_configuration();
>   	rte_service_finalize();
>   	rte_mp_channel_cleanup();
> +	eal_bus_cleanup();
>   	/* after this point, any DPDK pointers will become dangling */
>   	rte_eal_memory_detach();
>   	rte_eal_alarm_cleanup();
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_bus.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_bus.h
> index bbbb6efd28..9908a013f6 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_bus.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_bus.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ typedef int (*rte_bus_scan_t)(void);
>    */
>   typedef int (*rte_bus_probe_t)(void);
>   
> +/**
> + * Implementation specific cleanup function which is responsible for cleaning up
> + * devices on that bus with applicable drivers.
> + *
> + * This is called while iterating over each registered bus.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 0 for successful cleanup
> + * !0 for any error during cleanup
> + */
> +typedef int (*rte_bus_cleanup_t)(void);
> +
>   /**
>    * Device iterator to find a device on a bus.
>    *
> @@ -277,6 +289,7 @@ struct rte_bus {
>   				/**< handle hot-unplug failure on the bus */
>   	rte_bus_sigbus_handler_t sigbus_handler;
>   					/**< handle sigbus error on the bus */
> +	rte_bus_cleanup_t cleanup;   /**< Cleanup devices on bus */
>   
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> index 1ef263434a..9b32265ef5 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c
> @@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ rte_eal_cleanup(void)
>   	vfio_mp_sync_cleanup();
>   #endif
>   	rte_mp_channel_cleanup();
> +	eal_bus_cleanup();
>   	/* after this point, any DPDK pointers will become dangling */
>   	rte_eal_memory_detach();
>   	eal_mp_dev_hotplug_cleanup();
> diff --git a/lib/eal/windows/eal.c b/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> index 122de2a319..fedd6c971a 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ rte_eal_cleanup(void)
>   
>   	eal_intr_thread_cancel();
>   	eal_mem_virt2iova_cleanup();
> +	eal_bus_cleanup();
>   	/* after this point, any DPDK pointers will become dangling */
>   	rte_eal_memory_detach();
>   	eal_cleanup_config(internal_conf);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-04  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-19 16:14 [RFC] " Kevin Laatz
2022-04-19 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-20  6:55 ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-22  9:18   ` Kevin Laatz
2022-04-22 12:14     ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-22 16:27 ` [RFC v2] " Kevin Laatz
2022-05-24  9:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Kevin Laatz
2022-05-24  9:25 ` [PATCH v4] " Kevin Laatz
2022-05-24  9:38   ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-24 15:19     ` Kevin Laatz
2022-05-24 14:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-24 15:20     ` Kevin Laatz
2022-05-25 10:39 ` [PATCH v5] " Kevin Laatz
2022-05-25 11:12   ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-26  8:36     ` Kevin Laatz
2022-06-01 17:02 ` [PATCH v6] " Kevin Laatz
2022-06-01 17:03   ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-02  2:06   ` lihuisong (C)
2022-06-03 14:35     ` Kevin Laatz
2022-06-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v7] " Kevin Laatz
2022-06-03 15:11   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-03 15:39     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-04  2:07   ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2022-06-07 11:09   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-06-07 15:12     ` David Marchand
2022-06-13 15:58       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-10-03 12:35         ` David Marchand
2022-10-03 14:39           ` Kevin Laatz
2022-10-04 13:11 ` [PATCH v8] " Kevin Laatz
2022-10-04 15:28   ` David Marchand
2022-10-04 15:36     ` Kevin Laatz
2022-10-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v9] " Kevin Laatz
2022-10-05  7:45   ` David Marchand
2022-10-05  9:41     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 11:03       ` Kevin Laatz
2022-10-05 12:06         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=986821ef-54f6-a2c7-bc98-6d89cbc09d41@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).