From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7BD2A6C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:17:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2016 08:17:47 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,490,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="919418132"
Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2016 08:17:46 -0800
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.113]) by
 IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.97]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:17:46 +0000
From: "Kobylinski, MichalX" <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
To: "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: Question about patchset order.
Thread-Index: AdFuVbnuBN/VYSV6SGSP7HTZkmwmUA==
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:17:45 +0000
Message-ID: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02E312@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question about patchset order.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:17:48 -0000

Hi Thomas,
I sent in January a patch-set that extends to 24 bits a next_hop field in l=
pm library:
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/

also Jerin Jakob sent his patch-set with ARM architecture support in lpm li=
brary.
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10478/
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10479/
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10480/

Could you write please, in which order do you prefer to apply these two pat=
ch-sets?
This information will be helpful to predict the risk and estimate additiona=
l work.