From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
<alex@therouter.net>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: fix buffer overflow
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:15:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <988e9f4e-128b-bedc-4eb3-0eefb34745fc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xKz0CJWmcHDczQ1QKzBVX5=D-pfwHn3qBa_pJqn5OG5w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David,
On 20/10/2021 21:55, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:29 PM Vladimir Medvedkin
> <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch fixes buffer overflow reported by ASAN,
>> please reference https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=819
>>
>> The rte_lpm6 keeps routing information for control plane purpose
>> inside the rte_hash table which uses rte_jhash() as a hash function.
>> From the rte_jhash() documentation: If input key is not aligned to
>> four byte boundaries or a multiple of four bytes in length,
>> the memory region just after may be read (but not used in the
>> computation).
>> rte_lpm6 uses 17 bytes keys consisting of IPv6 address (16 bytes) +
>> depth (1 byte).
>>
>> This patch increases the size of the depth field up to uint32_t
>> and sets the alignment to 4 bytes.
>>
>> Bugzilla ID: 819
>> Fixes: 86b3b21952a8 ("lpm6: store rules in hash table")
>> Cc: alex@therouter.net
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> This change should be internal, and not breaking ABI, but are we sure
> we want to backport it?
>
I think yes, I don't see any reason why we should not backport it.
Do you think we should not?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c b/lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c
>> index 37baabb..d5e0918 100644
>> --- a/lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c
>> +++ b/lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c
>> @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ struct rte_lpm6_rule {
>> /** Rules tbl entry key. */
>> struct rte_lpm6_rule_key {
>> uint8_t ip[RTE_LPM6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE]; /**< Rule IP address. */
>> - uint8_t depth; /**< Rule depth. */
>> -};
>> + uint32_t depth; /**< Rule depth. */
>> +} __rte_aligned(sizeof(uint32_t));
>
> I would recommend doing the same than for hash tests: keep growing
> depth to 32bits, but no enforcement of alignment and add build check
> on structure size being sizeof(uin32_t) aligned.
>
Agree, will send v2
>
>>
>> /* Header of tbl8 */
>> struct rte_lpm_tbl8_hdr {
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
>
--
Regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 21:28 Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-10-20 19:55 ` David Marchand
2021-10-21 17:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir [this message]
2021-10-21 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-10-22 9:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-10-25 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=988e9f4e-128b-bedc-4eb3-0eefb34745fc@intel.com \
--to=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=alex@therouter.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).