From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ori Kam" <orika@mellanox.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: fix build warning on 64-bit value
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:37:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60FAD@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1847700.fxN4lLDhpz@thomas>
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 11:28 AM
>
> 27/04/2020 16:00, David Marchand:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:47 PM Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of David Marchand
> > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:34 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 03:23:41PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > > > Building OVS with dpdk, sparse complains about 64-bit
> constant being
> > > > > > passed as a normal integer that can't fit it:
> > > > > > error: constant 0xffffffffffffffff is so big it is unsigned
> long
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: ecbc8570131d ("ethdev: add PFCP header to flow API")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > > > static const struct rte_flow_item_pfcp
> rte_flow_item_pfcp_mask = {
> > > > > > .s_field = 0x01,
> > > > > > - .seid = RTE_BE64(0xffffffffffffffff),
> > > > > > + .seid = RTE_BE64(UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff)),
> > > > >
> > > > > Rather than cast, why not put "ULL" at the end. If we are going
> to cast,
> > > > > why not just put "-1" in to save some digits.
> > > >
> > > > I preferred this form in the hope future developers who want
> > > > 0x0fffffffffffffff will copy/paste this.
> > > >
> > >
> > > As I remember there should be UINT64_MAX in stdint.h.
> >
> > Yes, we could go with:
> > + .seid = RTE_BE64(UINT64_MAX),
> >
> > And then next time, for any value like 0x0fff ffff ffff ffff (had to
> > group the digits of what I had written), pretty sure we will miss
> this
> > and I will catch it only when building ovs.
>
> I agree with David (in general and especially here).
>
> RTE_BE64 is required for static analyzers and is an explicit info.
>
> UINT64_C is better than ULL suffix because it
> - is generic
> - gives size explicitly
Certainly. Explicit is preferred in code for embedded systems.
"unsigned long long" means 64 bit or more, which also applies to the "ULL" postfix.
"uint64_t" and "UINT64_C" means exactly 64 bit.
>
> UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff) is better than UINT64_MAX because
> - rte_flow.h has a lot of bitmasks
> - it is copy/paste safe
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>
And shouldn't the struct rte_flow_item_pfcp be packed? I would expect the compiler to add 32 bit padding before seid to ensure its 64 bit alignment.
Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
- Morten Brørup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 13:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] 20.05-rc1 fixes for OVS David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ring: fix build with -Wswitch-enum David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eal: fix typo in endian conversion macros David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: fix build warning on 64-bit value David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-27 13:34 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-27 13:36 ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-27 14:00 ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-27 14:12 ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-28 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-06 14:37 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2020-04-27 13:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-27 13:40 ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-28 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] 20.05-rc1 fixes for OVS David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60FAD@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).