From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>, "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe vector rx does not conform torte_eth_rx_burst() API
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61128@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB1391060094945333DE8AC929B77F0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 10:50 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:03 AM
> > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Yigit,
> Ferruh
> > <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> > Subject: ixgbe vector rx does not conform to rte_eth_rx_burst() API
> >
> > Wei, Jeff,
> >
> > For the ixgbe driver using vector functions, i.e.
> ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec(), calling
> > rte_eth_rx_burst() with nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST only returns
> > RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST packets. E.g. calling rte_eth_rx_burst() with
> > nb_pkts=64 only returns 32 packets.
> >
> >
> > The API description of rte_eth_rx_burst() says:
> >
> > <quote>
> > The rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns the number of packets
> actually
> > retrieved, which is the number of rte_mbuf data structures
> effectively supplied
> > into the rx_pkts array. A return value equal to nb_pkts indicates
> that the RX
> > queue contained at least rx_pkts packets, and this is likely to
> signify that other
> > received packets remain in the input queue. Applications implementing
> a
> > "retrieve as much received packets as possible" policy can check this
> specific
> > case and keep invoking the rte_eth_rx_burst() function until a value
> less than
> > nb_pkts is returned.
> > </quote>
> >
> > The driver implementation does not conform to the documented behavior
> for
> > "retrieve as much received packets as possible" applications.
>
> It seems not an issue, this function has comment bellow, it is design
> work in that way.
>
>
> /*
> * vPMD receive routine, only accept(nb_pkts >=
> RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP)
> *
> * Notice:
> * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> * - nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST, only scan RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST
> * numbers of DD bit
> * - floor align nb_pkts to a RTE_IXGBE_DESC_PER_LOOP power-of-two
> */
>
I noticed this already. And yes, ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec() does what its comments says.
However, when ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec() is used as the driver's implementation of the rte_eth_rx_burst() function call, the rte_eth_rx_burst() function does not do what is expected of the rte_eth_rx_burst() function.
The implementation must conform to the API that it implements.
If you don't want to update the ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec() function, I propose that you add a wrapper function that calls ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec() repeatedly, and use the wrapper function as the implementation of the rte_eth_rx_burst() function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 16:02 [dpdk-dev] ixgbe vector rx does not conform to rte_eth_rx_burst() API Morten Brørup
2020-07-16 8:49 ` Zhao1, Wei
2020-07-16 9:08 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2020-07-17 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] ixgbe vector rx does not conform torte_eth_rx_burst() API Bruce Richardson
2020-07-18 3:32 ` Zhao1, Wei
2020-07-18 3:44 ` Zhao1, Wei
2020-07-27 9:42 ` [dpdk-dev] ixgbe vector rx does not conform to rte_eth_rx_burst() API Morten Brørup
2020-07-27 10:35 ` Zhao1, Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61128@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).