DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	<arybchenko@solarflare.com>, <jia.guo@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() nb_pkts requirements
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C613B1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014113855.GG1513@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

> From: Morten Brørup
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 9:37 AM
> 
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 1:39 PM
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 01:14:13PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:

[...]

> > > 8 works with all drivers today, so I prefer 8. Also, it seems more
> future
> > proof for even higher bandwidths. If you need low latency, don't use
> vector
> > drivers. Also, DPDK generally seems to prefer throughput over
> latency, so 8
> > seems like the better choice to me.
> > >
> > > Bruce, if you have a very strong preference for standardizing on 4
> and
> > you can convince the affected driver developers to modify their
> drivers to
> > support 4, we can go ahead with that.
> > >
> > Let's go with 8 for now, and we can reduce in future if we can.
> 
> Great. If y'all agree now, can I get some Acks, then?

I think we agreed on the simple patch:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/77598/

Ack?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 11:05 Morten Brørup
2020-09-14 11:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-09-14 12:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() nb_pktsrequirements Morten Brørup
2020-10-13 10:55     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-14  8:26       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst()nb_pktsrequirements Morten Brørup
2020-10-14  8:53         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14  9:29           ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-14 11:14             ` Morten Brørup
2020-10-14 11:38               ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-15  7:36                 ` Morten Brørup
2020-10-26 15:06                 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2020-10-26 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() nb_pkts requirements Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-27 10:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-10-30  9:27   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C613B1@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).