From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DD9A0524; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:14:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92974068F; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:14:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EC540147 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:14:17 +0200 (CEST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:14:11 +0200 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61821@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <3254349.IzmrIriAmv@thomas> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases Thread-Index: AddZHkht5WG9OTBuTF6gZ+466HxDiwAAJ+cw References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61817@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <6441912.U1qnyMZzFn@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61820@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <3254349.IzmrIriAmv@thomas> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Thomas Monjalon" , "Ali Alnubani" Cc: , Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48 >=20 > 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas > Monjalon > > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for > "dpdk" > > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"? > > > > > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk- > > > stable. > > > > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that sentence, > then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I > originally requested. >=20 > No I meant dpdk-stable :) > In DPDK we have base releases, > in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor > stable releases. > At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo. OK. Now I get it! Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being = confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a = feature, not a bug." I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos into = one big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response = to my original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think? -Morten