From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <techboard@dpdk.org>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] gpudev: return EINVAL if invalid input pointer for free and unregister
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86D33@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3625450.hdfAi7Kttb@thomas>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2021 08.19
>
> 01/12/2021 22:37, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 06:04:56PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > if (ret < 0 && rte_errno == EAGAIN)
> >
> > i only urge that this be explicit as opposed to a range i.e. ret == -
> 1
> > preferred over ret < 0
>
> I don't understand why you think it is important to limit return value
> to -1.
> Why "if (ret == -1)" is better than "if (ret < 0)" ?
Speaking for myself:
For clarity. It leaves no doubt that "it failed" is represented by the return value -1, and that the function does not return errno values such as -EINVAL.
-Morten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-02 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 19:28 eagostini
2021-11-18 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-11-18 16:22 ` Elena Agostini
2021-11-18 20:19 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-19 9:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-19 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 17:24 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-24 18:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-12-01 21:37 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-02 7:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-12-02 12:33 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2021-12-02 13:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-12-02 13:56 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-03 10:37 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-08 17:34 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-08 18:40 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-09 19:43 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-08 17:27 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-19 10:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-11-18 20:33 ` [PATCH v2] gpudev: free and unregister return gracefully if input pointer is NULL eagostini
2021-11-22 18:24 ` [PATCH v3] gpudev: manage NULL pointer eagostini
2021-11-22 11:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-22 11:34 ` Elena Agostini
2021-11-22 11:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-22 23:52 ` [PATCH v4] " eagostini
2021-11-22 23:55 ` [PATCH v5] " eagostini
2021-11-22 16:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-23 0:15 ` [PATCH v6] " eagostini
2021-11-23 0:42 ` [PATCH v7] " eagostini
2021-11-24 8:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86D33@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).