From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Olivier Matz" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
<dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [RFC] mempool: modify flush threshold
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86DB9@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
Hi mempool maintainers and DPDK team.
Does anyone know the reason or history why CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER was chosen to be 1.5? I think it is counterintuitive.
The mempool cache flush threshold was introduced in DPDK version 1.3; it was not in DPDK version 1.2. The copyright notice for rte_mempool.c says year 2012.
Here is my analysis:
With the multiplier of 1.5, a mempool cache is allowed to be filled up to 50 % above than its target size before its excess entries are flushed to the mempool (thereby reducing the cache length to the target size).
In the opposite direction, a mempool cache is allowed to be drained completely, i.e. up to 100 % below its target size.
My instinct tells me that it would be more natural to let a mempool cache go the same amount above and below its target size, i.e. using a flush multiplier of 2 instead of 1.5.
Also, the cache should be allowed to fill up to and including the flush threshold, so it is flushed when the threshold is exceeded, instead of when it is reached.
Here is a simplified example:
Imagine a cache target size of 32, corresponding to a typical packet burst. With a flush threshold of 2 (and len > threshold instead of len >= threshold), the cache could hold 1 +/-1 packet bursts. With the current multiplier it can only hold [0 .. 1.5[ packet bursts, not really providing a lot of elasticity.
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
-Morten Brørup
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-28 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-28 14:28 Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-01-07 15:12 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-08 11:00 ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-10 9:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-24 15:56 ` Olivier Matz
2022-01-28 8:40 ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-28 8:52 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86DB9@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).