From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Gaoxiang Liu" <gaoxiangliu0@163.com>, <chas3@att.com>,
<humin29@huawei.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <liugaoxiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] net/bonding: another fix to LACP mempool size
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:04:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86F74@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325133426.2916-1-gaoxiangliu0@163.com>
> From: Gaoxiang Liu [mailto:gaoxiangliu0@163.com]
> Sent: Friday, 25 March 2022 14.34
>
> The following log message may appear after a slave is idle(or nearly
> idle)
> for a few minutes:"PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool".
> And bond mode 4 negotiation may fail.
>
> Problem:When bond mode 4 has been chosed and delicated queue has
> not been enable, all mbufs from a slave' private pool(used
> exclusively for transmitting LACPDUs) have been allocated in
> interrupt thread, and are still sitting in the device's tx
> descriptor ring and other cores' mempool caches in fwd thread.
> Thus the interrupt thread can not alloc LACP packet from pool.
>
> Solution: Ensure that each slave'tx (LACPDU) mempool owns more than
> n-tx-queues * n-tx-descriptor + fwd_core_num *
> per-core-mmempool-flush-threshold mbufs.
>
> Note that the LACP tx machine fuction is the only code that allocates
> from a slave's private pool. It runs in the context of the interrupt
> thread, and thus it has no mempool cache of its own.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaoxiang Liu <liugaoxiang@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> v2:
> * Fixed compile issues.
>
> v3:
> * delete duplicate code.
>
> v4;
> * Fixed some issues.
> 1. total_tx_desc should use +=
> 2. add detailed logs
>
> v5:
> * Fixed some issues.
> 1. move CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER to rte_eth_bond-8023ad.c
> 2. use RTE_MIN
>
> v6:
> * add a comment of CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER macro
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 11 ++++++++---
> lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index ca50583d62..2c39b0d062 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -1050,6 +1050,7 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(struct
> rte_eth_dev *bond_dev,
> uint32_t total_tx_desc;
> struct bond_tx_queue *bd_tx_q;
> uint16_t q_id;
> + uint32_t cache_size;
>
> /* Given slave mus not be in active list */
> RTE_ASSERT(find_slave_by_id(internals->active_slaves,
> @@ -1100,11 +1101,15 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(struct
> rte_eth_dev *bond_dev,
> total_tx_desc += bd_tx_q->nb_tx_desc;
> }
>
> +/* BONDING_8023AD_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER is the same as
> + * CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER already defined in rte_mempool.c */
> +#define BONDING_8023AD_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER 1.5
> +
> + cache_size = RTE_MIN(RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 32);
> + total_tx_desc += rte_lcore_count() * cache_size *
> BONDING_8023AD_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER;
> snprintf(mem_name, RTE_DIM(mem_name), "slave_port%u_pool",
> slave_id);
> port->mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(mem_name,
> total_tx_desc,
> - RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE >= 32 ?
> - 32 : RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
> - 0, element_size, socket_id);
> + cache_size, 0, element_size, socket_id);
>
> /* Any memory allocation failure in initialization is critical
> because
> * resources can't be free, so reinitialization is impossible. */
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index c5a699b1d6..6126067628 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static void
> mempool_event_callback_invoke(enum rte_mempool_event event,
> struct rte_mempool *mp);
>
> +/* CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER is the same as
> + * BONDING_8023AD_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER in
> rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c */
> #define CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER 1.5
> #define CALC_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH(c) \
> ((typeof(c))((c) * CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH_MULTIPLIER))
> --
> 2.32.0
>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-04 9:56 [PATCH] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-05 2:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-05 7:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-08 1:17 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-08 14:24 ` [PATCH v4] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-09 0:32 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-09 1:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-09 2:53 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-25 12:02 ` Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-09 1:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-25 12:10 ` [PATCH v5] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-25 13:01 ` Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-25 13:13 ` Morten Brørup
2022-03-26 12:57 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-03-25 13:34 ` [PATCH v6] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-03-25 14:04 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-03-28 15:16 ` [PATCH v7] " Gaoxiang Liu
2022-04-29 14:20 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-01 7:02 ` Matan Azrad
2024-04-12 19:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86F74@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaoxiangliu0@163.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=liugaoxiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).