From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: rte_ring_elem_pvt historical question
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D871A5@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
Does anyone here remember why the __rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_64/128() functions support unaligned object arrays, when the __rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_32() functions require 4 byte aligned object arrays?
I'm wondering if the compiler could do better with a simpler implementation than the manually implemented loop unrolls, and if the unalignment silliness would stand in the way.
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
-Morten Brørup
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 11:35 Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-07-05 8:54 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-05 13:40 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D871A5@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).