From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39138A0540; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98B9410E5; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0182340E09 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:11 +0200 (CEST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: rte_ring_elem_pvt historical question Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D871A5@smartserver.smartshare.dk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: rte_ring_elem_pvt historical question Thread-Index: AdiPmh3v7eNHanJjSTOuOsIHyzvu4Q== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Does anyone here remember why the = __rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_64/128() functions support unaligned = object arrays, when the __rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_32() functions = require 4 byte aligned object arrays? I'm wondering if the compiler could do better with a simpler = implementation than the manually implemented loop unrolls, and if the = unalignment silliness would stand in the way. Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards, -Morten Br=F8rup