* [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
@ 2022-08-23 10:57 Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-23 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing; +Cc: dev, jerinj, Amit Prakash Shukla, stable
GCC 12 raises the following warning:
meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
--cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
ninja -C build
In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
error: array subscript 53 is above array
bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
{aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
'pattern_item_header'
182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
index 8962e9d97a..a1ff85fceb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
@@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ i40e_hash_get_pattern_type(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
}
prev_item_type = last_item_type;
- assert(last_item_type < (enum rte_flow_item_type)
- RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header));
+ if (last_item_type >= (enum rte_flow_item_type)
+ RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header))
+ goto not_sup;
+
item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
assert(item_hdr);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] net/qede/base: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-23 10:57 [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12 Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-23 10:57 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-23 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasesh Mody, Devendra Singh Rawat
Cc: dev, jerinj, Amit Prakash Shukla, stable
GCC 12 raises the following warning:
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c: In function
'ecore_dmae_to_grc.constprop.isra':
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1418:25:
error: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of 'u32[1]'
{aka 'unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1418 | ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1419 | ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1465:17: note:
in expansion of macro 'ARR_REG_WR'
1465 | ARR_REG_WR(p_hwfn, p_ptt, addr, pData, len_in_dwords);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1439:35:
note: at offset 4 into object 'pData' of size 4
1439 | u32 *pData,
| ~~~~~^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fixes: 3b307c55f2ac (net/qede/base: update FW to 8.40.25.0)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c b/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
index 6a52f32cc9..4e4d1dc374 100644
--- a/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ void ecore_init_brb_ram(struct ecore_hwfn *p_hwfn,
u32 i; \
for (i = 0; i < (arr_size); i++) \
ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
- ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
+ ((u32 *)(arr))[i]); \
} while (0)
#ifndef DWORDS_TO_BYTES
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-23 10:57 [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12 Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-23 10:57 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 13:12 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-23 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ruifeng Wang, Radu Nicolau, Akhil Goyal
Cc: dev, jerinj, Amit Prakash Shukla, stable
GCC 12 raises the following warning:
meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized --cross-file
config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_gcc -Ddefault_library=shared
-Dexamples=all build
ninja -C build
In file included from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:9,
from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:16:
In function 'send_multi_pkts',
inlined from 'route6_pkts_neon' at
../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:170:2,
inlined from 'ipsec_poll_mode_wrkr_inl_pr' at
../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:1257:4:
../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h:261:21: error: 'dst_port' may be used
uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
261 | dlp = dst_port[i - 1];
| ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:16:
../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c: In function
'ipsec_poll_mode_wrkr_inl_pr':
../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:118:17:
note: 'dst_port' declared here
118 | int32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
| ^~~~~~~~
Fixes: ce23f7ceec6b (examples/ipsec-secgw: add support of NEON with poll mode)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
index 959a5a8666..25f0abcaf3 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void
route6_pkts_neon(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, int nb_rx)
{
uint8_t dst_ip6[MAX_PKT_BURST][16];
- int32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
+ uint16_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr;
int32_t hop[MAX_PKT_BURST];
@@ -157,17 +157,15 @@ route6_pkts_neon(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, int nb_rx)
pkt = pkts[i];
if (pkt->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD) {
/* Read hop from the SA */
- dst_port[i] = get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkt, 1);
+ dst_port[i] = (uint16_t)get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkt, 1);
} else {
/* Need to use hop returned by lookup */
- dst_port[i] = hop[lpm_pkts++];
+ dst_port[i] = (uint16_t)hop[lpm_pkts++];
}
- if (dst_port[i] == -1)
- dst_port[i] = BAD_PORT;
}
/* Send packets */
- send_multi_pkts(pkts, (uint16_t *)dst_port, nb_rx, 0, 0, false);
+ send_multi_pkts(pkts, dst_port, nb_rx, 0, 0, false);
}
/*
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-23 13:12 ` Akhil Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2022-08-23 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla, Ruifeng Wang, Radu Nicolau
Cc: dev, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Amit Prakash Shukla, stable
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized --cross-file
> config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_gcc -Ddefault_library=shared
> -Dexamples=all build
> ninja -C build
>
> In file included from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:9,
> from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:16:
> In function 'send_multi_pkts',
> inlined from 'route6_pkts_neon' at
> ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:170:2,
> inlined from 'ipsec_poll_mode_wrkr_inl_pr' at
> ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:1257:4:
> ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h:261:21: error: 'dst_port' may be used
> uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 261 | dlp = dst_port[i - 1];
> | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c:16:
> ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_worker.c: In function
> 'ipsec_poll_mode_wrkr_inl_pr':
> ../examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h:118:17:
> note: 'dst_port' declared here
> 118 | int32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
> | ^~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: ce23f7ceec6b (examples/ipsec-secgw: add support of NEON with poll
> mode)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> ---
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h b/examples/ipsec-
> secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
> index 959a5a8666..25f0abcaf3 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_lpm_neon.h
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void
> route6_pkts_neon(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, int nb_rx)
> {
> uint8_t dst_ip6[MAX_PKT_BURST][16];
> - int32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
> + uint16_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
> struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
> struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr;
> int32_t hop[MAX_PKT_BURST];
> @@ -157,17 +157,15 @@ route6_pkts_neon(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct
> rte_mbuf **pkts, int nb_rx)
> pkt = pkts[i];
> if (pkt->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD) {
> /* Read hop from the SA */
> - dst_port[i] = get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkt, 1);
> + dst_port[i] = (uint16_t)get_hop_for_offload_pkt(pkt,
> 1);
> } else {
> /* Need to use hop returned by lookup */
> - dst_port[i] = hop[lpm_pkts++];
> + dst_port[i] = (uint16_t)hop[lpm_pkts++];
> }
> - if (dst_port[i] == -1)
> - dst_port[i] = BAD_PORT;
get_hop_for_offload_pkt is returning -1, can you also return BAD_PORT from that
if there is error. And you would not need to typecast it explicitly to uin16_t.
> }
>
> /* Send packets */
> - send_multi_pkts(pkts, (uint16_t *)dst_port, nb_rx, 0, 0, false);
> + send_multi_pkts(pkts, dst_port, nb_rx, 0, 0, false);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-23 10:57 [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12 Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-24 14:03 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
` (3 more replies)
2 siblings, 4 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-24 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing; +Cc: dev, jerinj, stable, Amit Prakash Shukla
GCC 12 raises the following warning:
meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
--cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
ninja -C build
In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
error: array subscript 53 is above array
bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
{aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
'pattern_item_header'
182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
v2:
- Removed "examples/ipsec-secgw" patch from this series and posted it as
seperate patch.
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
index 8962e9d97a..a1ff85fceb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
@@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ i40e_hash_get_pattern_type(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
}
prev_item_type = last_item_type;
- assert(last_item_type < (enum rte_flow_item_type)
- RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header));
+ if (last_item_type >= (enum rte_flow_item_type)
+ RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header))
+ goto not_sup;
+
item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
assert(item_hdr);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-24 14:03 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-10-06 9:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-25 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Morten Brørup
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-24 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasesh Mody, Devendra Singh Rawat
Cc: dev, jerinj, stable, Amit Prakash Shukla
GCC 12 raises the following warning:
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c: In function
'ecore_dmae_to_grc.constprop.isra':
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1418:25:
error: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of 'u32[1]'
{aka 'unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1418 | ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1419 | ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1465:17: note:
in expansion of macro 'ARR_REG_WR'
1465 | ARR_REG_WR(p_hwfn, p_ptt, addr, pData, len_in_dwords);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1439:35:
note: at offset 4 into object 'pData' of size 4
1439 | u32 *pData,
| ~~~~~^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fixes: 3b307c55f2ac (net/qede/base: update FW to 8.40.25.0)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c b/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
index 6a52f32cc9..4e4d1dc374 100644
--- a/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ void ecore_init_brb_ram(struct ecore_hwfn *p_hwfn,
u32 i; \
for (i = 0; i < (arr_size); i++) \
ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
- ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
+ ((u32 *)(arr))[i]); \
} while (0)
#ifndef DWORDS_TO_BYTES
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-25 7:21 ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-26 9:45 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-10-06 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-08-25 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing; +Cc: dev, jerinj, stable
> From: Amit Prakash Shukla [mailto:amitprakashs@marvell.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16.04
>
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
> --cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
> ninja -C build
>
> In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
> error: array subscript 53 is above array
> bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
> {aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
> 'pattern_item_header'
> 182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Removed "examples/ipsec-secgw" patch from this series and posted it
> as
> seperate patch.
>
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> index 8962e9d97a..a1ff85fceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ i40e_hash_get_pattern_type(const struct
> rte_flow_item pattern[],
> }
>
> prev_item_type = last_item_type;
> - assert(last_item_type < (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> - RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header));
> + if (last_item_type >= (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> + RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header))
Does this compile with the correct static branch prediction? If not, please add unlikely() to error checks like this.
> + goto not_sup;
> +
> item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> assert(item_hdr);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-25 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Morten Brørup
@ 2022-08-26 9:45 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-26 10:32 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Amit Prakash Shukla @ 2022-08-26 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing, mb
Cc: dev, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, stable
Thanks Morten for the review comment.
As the change is not in datapath, branch prediction optimization was not done.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 7:34 PM
> To: Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org; Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
>
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
> --cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
> ninja -C build
>
> In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
> error: array subscript 53 is above array
> bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
> {aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
> 'pattern_item_header'
> 182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Removed "examples/ipsec-secgw" patch from this series and posted it as
> seperate patch.
>
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> index 8962e9d97a..a1ff85fceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ i40e_hash_get_pattern_type(const struct
> rte_flow_item pattern[],
> }
>
> prev_item_type = last_item_type;
> - assert(last_item_type < (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> - RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header));
> + if (last_item_type >= (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> + RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header))
> + goto not_sup;
> +
> item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> assert(item_hdr);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-26 9:45 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-08-26 10:32 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-08-26 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing
Cc: dev, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, stable
> From: Amit Prakash Shukla [mailto:amitprakashs@marvell.com]
> Sent: Friday, 26 August 2022 11.45
>
> Thanks Morten for the review comment.
>
> As the change is not in datapath, branch prediction optimization was
> not done.
OK. Then I agree that it is not required.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 7:34 PM
> >
> > GCC 12 raises the following warning:
> >
> > meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
> > --cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
> > ninja -C build
> >
> > In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
> > inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
> > inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
> > inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
> > error: array subscript 53 is above array
> > bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
> > {aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> > 389 | item_hdr =
> pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> > |
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
> > ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
> > 'pattern_item_header'
> > 182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Removed "examples/ipsec-secgw" patch from this series and posted it
> as
> > seperate patch.
> >
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> > index 8962e9d97a..a1ff85fceb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c
> > @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ i40e_hash_get_pattern_type(const struct
> > rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > }
> >
> > prev_item_type = last_item_type;
> > - assert(last_item_type < (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> > - RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header));
> > + if (last_item_type >= (enum rte_flow_item_type)
> > + RTE_DIM(pattern_item_header))
> > + goto not_sup;
> > +
> > item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> > assert(item_hdr);
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-08-26 9:45 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-10-06 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2022-10-06 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla
Cc: Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing, stable, dev, jerinj, stable
24/08/2022 16:03, Amit Prakash Shukla:
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> meson --werror --buildtype=debugoptimized
> --cross-file config/x86/cross-mingw -Dexamples=helloworld build
> ninja -C build
>
> In function 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_type',
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_get_pattern_pctypes' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:520:8,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse_pattern_act' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1147:9,
> inlined from 'i40e_hash_parse' at
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:1181:9:
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47:
> error: array subscript 53 is above array
> bounds of 'const uint64_t[53]'
> {aka 'const long long unsigned int[53]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c: In function 'i40e_hash_parse':
> ../drivers/net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:182:23: note: while referencing
> 'pattern_item_header'
> 182 | static const uint64_t pattern_item_header[] = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 (net/i40e: refactor RSS flow)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
Sorry I did not notice this patch and I recently submitted one
which I will abandon.
It seems there was no reply from i40e maintainers after 6 weeks,
but I will apply anyway.
I will use my commit message:
net/i40e: fix build with MinGW GCC 12
When compiling with MinGW GCC 12,
the rte_flow_item array is seen as read out of bound:
net/i40e/i40e_hash.c:389:47: error:
array subscript 50 is above array bounds of ‘const uint64_t[50]’
{aka ‘const long long unsigned int[50]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]
389 | item_hdr = pattern_item_header[last_item_type];
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It seems the assert check done above this line has no impact.
A real check is added to make the compiler happy.
Fixes: ef4c16fd9148 ("net/i40e: refactor RSS flow")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: compilation fix for GCC-12
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
@ 2022-10-06 9:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2022-10-06 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Prakash Shukla
Cc: Rasesh Mody, Devendra Singh Rawat, stable, dev, jerinj
24/08/2022 16:03, Amit Prakash Shukla:
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> ../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c: In function
> 'ecore_dmae_to_grc.constprop.isra':
> ../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1418:25:
> error: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of 'u32[1]'
> {aka 'unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 1418 | ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1419 | ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1465:17: note:
> in expansion of macro 'ARR_REG_WR'
> 1465 | ARR_REG_WR(p_hwfn, p_ptt, addr, pData, len_in_dwords);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1439:35:
> note: at offset 4 into object 'pData' of size 4
> 1439 | u32 *pData,
> | ~~~~~^~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> Fixes: 3b307c55f2ac (net/qede/base: update FW to 8.40.25.0)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>
Sorry I did not notice this patch and I recently submitted one
which I will abandon.
It seems there was no reply from qede maintainers after 6 weeks,
but I will apply anyway.
I will use my commit message:
net/qede/base: fix 32-bit build with GCC 12
A pointer is passed to a macro and it seems mistakenly referenced.
This issue is seen only when compiling with GCC 12 for 32-bit:
drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1418:25:
error: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of ‘u32[1]’
{aka ‘unsigned int[1]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1418 | ecore_wr(dev, ptt, ((addr) + (4 * i)), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1419 | ((u32 *)&(arr))[i]); \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1465:17:
note: in expansion of macro ‘ARR_REG_WR’
1465 | ARR_REG_WR(p_hwfn, p_ptt, addr, pData, len_in_dwords);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1439:35:
note: at offset 4 into object ‘pData’ of size 4
1439 | u32 *pData,
| ~~~~~^~~~~
Fixes: 3b307c55f2ac ("net/qede/base: update FW to 8.40.25.0")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-06 9:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-23 10:57 [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: compilation fix for GCC-12 Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-23 13:12 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/qede/base: " Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-10-06 9:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-25 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: " Morten Brørup
2022-08-26 9:45 ` Amit Prakash Shukla
2022-08-26 10:32 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).