From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"Jerin Jacob" <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@marvell.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Li, WeiyuanX" <weiyuanx.li@intel.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: RE: rte_event_dev_xstats_reset id type
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:41:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D873D6@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN0PR11MB57125A64B4A315DD22ED1FC8D7229@BN0PR11MB5712.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> From: Van Haaren, Harry [mailto:harry.van.haaren@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2022 12.30
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 10:45 AM
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:40 PM Morten Brørup
> <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jerin (eventdev maintainer),
> >
> > + harry.van.haaren@intel.com as the changes in drivers/event/sw.
>
> Thanks Jerin.
>
>
> > > While looking into bug #1101 [1], I noticed a mix of unsigned int
> and uint32_t in
> > the test code, which will fail on 64-bit big endian CPUs.
>
> Aha; that we can fix. I am curious why this isn't found in CI/reported
> before.
We probably don't test any 64-bit *big endian* architectures. Just a guess.
>
>
> > > Specifically, rte_event_dev_xstats_reset() is called with the "ids"
> parameter
> > pointing to an unsigned int [2], but that parameter is a pointer to
> an uint32_t.
> > >
> > > I think the type of the ids array parameter to
> rte_event_dev_xstats_reset() should
> > be changed to unsigned int array, like in the other
> rte_event_dev_xxx() functions.
>
> In this case, we have the option to change the type of a variable in a
> test-case, or change API and cause API/ABI breakage.
Well.. yes, but I would phrase that last option: Change the API/ABI, so related functions consistently use the same type for the same variable, instead of randomly mixing uint64_t, uint32_t and unsigned int, depending on function.
Unfortunately, these functions are not marked experimental, so breaking API/ABI is hard to do. :-(
> Lets change the unit test code from "unsigned int" to uint32_t, and
> that will fix the issue?
>
> From a quick review in the test code, there are 3x occurrences of
> "unsigned int id" being used.
> I will send a patch to change them later today.
A simple change to uint32_t would be incorrect.
rte_event_dev_xstats_by_name_get() uses unsigned int, not uint32_t.
Only rte_event_dev_xstats_reset() uses uint32_t.
>
>
> > > Or even better, use the same type for an "xstats id" across all
> device types. For
> > ethdev devices, they are uint64_t, but I don't know why. (They are
> passed around as
> > arrays, so they could be 32 bit. I guess that they were originally
> not used in arrays, so
> > unsigned int seemed the logical choice.)
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1101
> > > [2]:
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c#n17
> 66
> > >
> > >
> > > Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
> > > -Morten Brørup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 8:10 Morten Brørup
2022-10-12 9:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 10:29 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-10-12 10:41 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-10-12 12:14 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-10-12 15:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:35 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-12 16:16 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 16:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 16:47 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 20:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-13 6:51 ` xstats " Morten Brørup
2022-10-13 7:12 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2022-10-13 8:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-13 8:33 ` [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2022-10-13 8:59 ` Van Haaren, Harry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D873D6@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=weiyuanx.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).