DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Ophir Munk" <ophirmu@nvidia.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Devendra Singh Rawat" <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
	"Alok Prasad" <palok@marvell.com>
Cc: "Ophir Munk" <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
	"Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Lior Margalit" <lmargalit@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] lib: set/get max memzone segments
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 23:41:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D878E3@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230503072641.474600-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com>

> From: Ophir Munk [mailto:ophirmu@nvidia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 09.27
> 
> In current DPDK the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE definition is unconditionally hard
> coded as 2560.  For applications requiring different values of this
> parameter – it is more convenient to set the max value via an rte API -
> rather than changing the dpdk source code per application.  In many
> organizations, the possibility to compile a private DPDK library for a
> particular application does not exist at all.  With this option there is
> no need to recompile DPDK and it allows using an in-box packaged DPDK.
> An example usage for updating the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE would be of an
> application that uses the DPDK mempool library which is based on DPDK
> memzone library.  The application may need to create a number of
> steering tables, each of which will require its own mempool allocation.
> This commit is not about how to optimize the application usage of
> mempool nor about how to improve the mempool implementation based on
> memzone.  It is about how to make the max memzone definition - run-time
> customized.
> This commit adds an API which must be called before rte_eal_init():
> rte_memzone_max_set(int max).  If not called, the default memzone
> (RTE_MAX_MEMZONE) is used.  There is also an API to query the effective
> max memzone: rte_memzone_max_get().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>

I retracted my objection to the RFC, but should also have added:

Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19  8:36 [RFC] " Ophir Munk
2023-04-19  8:48 ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 13:42 ` [EXT] " Devendra Singh Rawat
2023-04-24 21:07   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 14:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-24 21:43   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 14:51 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-20  7:43   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-20 18:20     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-21  8:34       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-21 11:08         ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-21 14:57           ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-21 15:19             ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-25 16:38               ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-25 13:46   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-25 16:40 ` [RFC V2] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-03  7:26   ` [PATCH V3] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-03 21:41     ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-05-25  6:47       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-04  7:27     ` David Marchand
2023-05-25  6:35       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-18 15:54     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-25  6:43       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-24 22:25     ` [PATCH v4] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-25 14:53       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-30 11:37         ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-26  9:55       ` David Marchand
2023-05-28 12:09         ` [EXT] " Alok Prasad
2023-05-30 13:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31  7:56         ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-31  7:52       ` [PATCH V5] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-31  8:41         ` [PATCH V6] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05  8:52           ` [PATCH V7] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05 10:50             ` [PATCH V8] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05 16:50               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D878E3@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
    --cc=lmargalit@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=palok@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).