From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42024333B; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:31:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0088D40A71; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:31:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09009402B2; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:31:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10]) by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA7E206C3; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:31:17 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal: fix alignment of RISCV xmm vector type X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:31:16 +0100 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F032@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <1700083003-6641-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH] eal: fix alignment of RISCV xmm vector type Thread-Index: AdoYCQn+skD2DfrnTWOhweXUQUegbAAAS7xg References: <1700083003-6641-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Tyler Retzlaff" , , "Stanislaw Kardach" Cc: "Michal Mazurek" , X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2023 22.17 >=20 > Fix the alignment for rte_xmm_t it should be 16 instead of 8 bytes. >=20 > Fixes: f22e705ebf12 ("eal/riscv: support RISC-V architecture") > Cc: maz@semihalf.com > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff > --- Reviewed-by: Morten Br=F8rup As mentioned in the other thread: We need to urgently decide if this bug should live on in DPDK 23.11, or = if the fix should be included although we are very late in the release = process. Stanislaw, what do you think? Furthermore, I wonder if it can be backported to stable, and to what = extent backporting it would break the ABI/API.