DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Cody Cheng" <ccheng@iol.unh.edu>,
	"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <techboard@dpdk.org>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Ali Alnubani" <alialnu@nvidia.com>, <galco@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: Clarification on Minimum Supported Kernel Version for DPDK
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:28:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FB37@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMEVEZvCoVpMjFpmY29-x0zB2tQvNrJsTacs6-Zzx4jJB_GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>

@Kevin, @Stephen, @Bruce,

I cannot reliably answer Cody's question, and it may need further discussion.

What is your opinion on minimum Linux kernel version requirements?

@Thomas: In the future, the DPDK release notes should mention the minimum Linux kernel requirements.

> From: Cody Cheng [mailto:ccheng@iol.unh.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2025 21.28
> 
> Hi Morten,
> 
> I am in the process of setting up a test environment at the UNH DPDK
> Community Test Lab that follows the minimum supported kernel version
> for DPDK. According to the DPDK documentation, the minimum supported
> kernel version is 4.19. However, the oldest long term stable kernel
> version listed on kernel.org is 5.4.291.
> 
> Should the test environment be set up on kernel version 4.19 or
> 5.4.291?

The kernel 4.19 support stems from still supporting RHEL/CentOS 7.
I wonder if this exception mentioned in the documentation [1] is still valid, or if we should bump it to RHEL/CentOS 8, which ships with kernel 4.18 [1].

RHEL/CentOS 7 support was discussed at by tech board long ago [2], but I cannot find a conclusion about the kernel version; the discussion was mostly about compiler support.

[1]: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.html#system-software
[2]: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html-single/8.0_release_notes/index#overview
[3]: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-February/263516.html


> 
> Thanks,
> Cody Cheng
> UNH DPDK Community Test Lab


       reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAMEVEZvCoVpMjFpmY29-x0zB2tQvNrJsTacs6-Zzx4jJB_GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-03-21  6:28 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2025-03-21  8:34   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-21 10:42     ` Morten Brørup
2025-03-21 15:52   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FB37@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ccheng@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=galco@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).