From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Cody Cheng" <ccheng@iol.unh.edu>,
"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Ali Alnubani" <alialnu@nvidia.com>, <galco@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: Clarification on Minimum Supported Kernel Version for DPDK
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FB37@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMEVEZvCoVpMjFpmY29-x0zB2tQvNrJsTacs6-Zzx4jJB_GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
@Kevin, @Stephen, @Bruce,
I cannot reliably answer Cody's question, and it may need further discussion.
What is your opinion on minimum Linux kernel version requirements?
@Thomas: In the future, the DPDK release notes should mention the minimum Linux kernel requirements.
> From: Cody Cheng [mailto:ccheng@iol.unh.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2025 21.28
>
> Hi Morten,
>
> I am in the process of setting up a test environment at the UNH DPDK
> Community Test Lab that follows the minimum supported kernel version
> for DPDK. According to the DPDK documentation, the minimum supported
> kernel version is 4.19. However, the oldest long term stable kernel
> version listed on kernel.org is 5.4.291.
>
> Should the test environment be set up on kernel version 4.19 or
> 5.4.291?
The kernel 4.19 support stems from still supporting RHEL/CentOS 7.
I wonder if this exception mentioned in the documentation [1] is still valid, or if we should bump it to RHEL/CentOS 8, which ships with kernel 4.18 [1].
RHEL/CentOS 7 support was discussed at by tech board long ago [2], but I cannot find a conclusion about the kernel version; the discussion was mostly about compiler support.
[1]: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.html#system-software
[2]: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html-single/8.0_release_notes/index#overview
[3]: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-February/263516.html
>
> Thanks,
> Cody Cheng
> UNH DPDK Community Test Lab
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAMEVEZvCoVpMjFpmY29-x0zB2tQvNrJsTacs6-Zzx4jJB_GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-03-21 6:28 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2025-03-21 8:34 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-21 10:42 ` Morten Brørup
2025-03-21 15:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FB37@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ccheng@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=galco@nvidia.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).