* DPDK libs as one big shared object
@ 2025-06-16 16:14 Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2025-06-16 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: techboard
Why are we still building one .so file per DPDK library, instead of just building one big dpdk.so for all DPDK libraries?
I think it's legacy from when DPDK libraries were versioned individually, and thus not relevant anymore.
Wouldn't building one big dpdk.so eliminate the problems with circular dependencies between DPDK libraries?
-Morten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-06-16 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-16 16:14 DPDK libs as one big shared object Morten Brørup
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).