From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] ethdev: TX mbuf fast release optimization
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 17:12:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FD88@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGaQNxwbTTTF0Al7@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2025 16.14
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 03:59:14PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > For TX mbuf fast release offload, I propose to add the mbuf mempool
> > pointer to the ethdev tx queue configuration structure,
> > so the ethdev TX burst operation doesn't need to fetch it from the
> > first mbuf of each burst being fast free'd to the mempool.
> >
> > This modification of the struct rte_eth_txconf, and the requirement
> > to set the mempool pointer if the RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE
> > flag is set, will be an API+ABI change in 25.11.
> > Should it be announced in the 25.07 release notes?
> >
> > Note: We could phase it in softly by letting the ethdev drivers
> > check if the pointer has been set, and fall back to fetching it
> > from mbuf[0] if not.
> >
> > /**
> > * A structure used to configure a Tx ring of an Ethernet port.
> > */
> > struct rte_eth_txconf {
> > struct rte_eth_thresh tx_thresh; /**< Tx ring threshold registers.
> */
> > uint16_t tx_rs_thresh; /**< Drives the setting of RS bit on TXDs.
> */
> > uint16_t tx_free_thresh; /**< Start freeing Tx buffers if there
> are
> > less free descriptors than this value. */
> >
> > uint8_t tx_deferred_start; /**< Do not start queue with
> rte_eth_dev_start(). */
> > /**
> > * Per-queue Tx offloads to be set using RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_*
> flags.
> > * Only offloads set on tx_queue_offload_capa or tx_offload_capa
> > * fields on rte_eth_dev_info structure are allowed to be set.
> > */
> > uint64_t offloads;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * Per-queue mempool to release the mbufs to; required for
> > + * RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
> > + */
> > + struct rte_mempool *mp;
> > +
>
> Is this really best put in the txconf struct? Would it not be better
> just
> stored in the queue structure on free or Tx of the first packet? That
> would
> make it not change the ABI.
It seems natural to me to specify the mempool at configuration time,
because it is a configuration parameter.
The txconf struct seemed like the best place to put it.
Fetching it from the first mbuf of each burst at runtime, and possibly caching it, seems like a workaround for the missing configuration parameter.
If backwards ABI compatibility is important, we can modify the struct as follows:
struct rte_eth_txconf {
struct rte_eth_thresh tx_thresh; /**< Tx ring threshold registers. */
uint16_t tx_rs_thresh; /**< Drives the setting of RS bit on TXDs. */
uint16_t tx_free_thresh; /**< Start freeing Tx buffers if there are
less free descriptors than this value. */
uint8_t tx_deferred_start; /**< Do not start queue with rte_eth_dev_start(). */
/**
* Per-queue Tx offloads to be set using RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_* flags.
* Only offloads set on tx_queue_offload_capa or tx_offload_capa
* fields on rte_eth_dev_info structure are allowed to be set.
*/
uint64_t offloads;
+ /**
+ * Per-queue mempool to release the mbufs to; required for
+ * RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ */
+ struct rte_mempool *mp;
+ #ifdef RTE_ARCH_32
+ uint32_t reserved_32s[1]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
+ #endif
- uint64_t reserved_64s[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
+ uint64_t reserved_64s[1]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
void *reserved_ptrs[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 13:59 Morten Brørup
2025-07-03 14:14 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-03 15:12 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2025-07-03 15:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-03 15:29 ` Morten Brørup
2025-07-03 15:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-03 17:29 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FD88@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).