From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA591B687 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:15:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F168E210D7; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:15:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:15:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=EQ/ksm3ElmQOJOKS36iyNvNvXI tv6mMddLkXRPKqxZ8=; b=VlyMcXyButq3aLWIcrKUyOyAsKZc1xUP6emNrU8BoX 0EcXuroe5fRGkQuRW7mrYvpgx6CP/DLtwRZ5yF8wTlkzA0r32E1PaCZOd5Zu4Lvw olBIj/YDBu9p6gmIMv6avUJIT+IyqhTyZcLNjB1F303Dc9I0VeRdA2pD81MvtUjL E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=EQ/ksm 3ElmQOJOKS36iyNvNvXItv6mMddLkXRPKqxZ8=; b=GVbFmcvfDWnXg6kfHm8ShV H40N/jBCYqApDddRsekpG0ko7cn73cdqNR5F5RbyCULIiYm707tOZYr7TxXmqmx9 mcYnmVq5q9MMJF9fkjoe0/rVl8gjk2xzXLMjiGutpuzXWoHtOPxAkauOd4pU4Kbz LHxr5Qd/MNKF646JxjqVwJZYyLID45ww6qGAiAT9XLjeIRKtoV46MA7PRGIo5Xyk Zjn9Tk1rujpfs9+4NNEcpruN1OzLQG1pJrrEocx0uqLbcnmgQQjdMYn1whY6MqCd ZL3zY785UfS7JjnQfhthQiK/mriIvTeHENX8WAuq3+snkTrZ983x50P9D+Y/FtFQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9832D244E7; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:15:47 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:15:01 +0100 Message-ID: <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps> In-Reply-To: <20180130125722.GA15525@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <15180448.zpY6jWigv2@xps> <20180130125722.GA15525@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:15:48 -0000 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman: > > > v5 Changes > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas > > > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5. > > Rebased and applied, thanks. > > > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this. Are you saying that there were several > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed? If > so, thanks for doing that. I will also be sending another patch set soon, to > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the > version map as such I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions after you sent the v5. So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions. Usual rebase work. About reconciling experimental functions and map, we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental.