From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <huwei87@hisilicon.com>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: add a new flow action of queue range
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 15:30:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <996c7d92-6f87-d14a-f084-50372434e01a@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594978339-9720-1-git-send-email-xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
On 7/17/20 12:32 PM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>
> This patch adds a new flow action of queue range, which was used to assign
> packets to a continuous queue range.
>
> Current FD (flow director) provide a useful means to assign packets to
> a target queue. But it has the following shortage: it can only route
> to one queue, and there is an upper limit on one queue rxtx capacity,
> which means the FD rule need more accurate else it may exceed the
> queue capacity.
>
> With the support of queue range action, user can create FD rule with
> action routed to a continuous queues, like:
> FD rule 0 ------|-----> queue 0
> |-----> queue 1
>
> FD rule 1 ------|-----> queue 8
> |-----> queue 9
> |-----> queue 10
> |-----> queue 11
> Note: hardware can use RSS to distribute traffic to the continuous queues
> when packets match the above FD rule.
>
> With the support of queue range action, we can further provide QoS
> service when DCB disabled.
> eg: one NE (network element) is configured with two ip addresses, one for
> control plane and the other for data plane, user can create two FD rules,
> the first for directing control plane packets to queue 0, the second for
> directing data plane packets to queue 1~15.
I don't understand why it is not covered by RSS action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-19 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 9:32 Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-07-19 12:30 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2020-07-19 13:32 ` Ori Kam
2020-07-19 13:34 ` Ori Kam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=996c7d92-6f87-d14a-f084-50372434e01a@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=huwei87@hisilicon.com \
--cc=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).