Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core

["Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

Thanks Shachar,

I have seen v7 [1], I will wait this and depended two patches to be acked before getting them.

Thanks,
ferruh

[1]
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28852/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shachar Beiser [mailto:shacharbe@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 2:43 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Nélio Laranjeiro
> <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:07 PM
> > To: Shachar Beiser <shacharbe@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Nélio Laranjeiro
> > <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream
> > rdma-core
> >
> > On 9/17/2017 8:31 AM, Shachar Beiser wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 4:47 PM
> > >> To: Shachar Beiser <shacharbe@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > >> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Nélio Laranjeiro
> > >> <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream
> > >> rdma-core
> > >>
> > >> On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote:
> > >>> This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by
> > >>> using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code.
> > >>
> > >> Would you mind mentioning what is the difference between "specific
> > >> Mellanox OFED libraries" and "upstream rdma-core"? If not in the
> > >> documentation, at least in mail list for interested people?
> > >>
> > >> Does it make sense to put this update into release notes?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> ferruh
> > >>
> > >
> > >  Hi Ferruh,
> > >
> > > Both packages, rdma-core upstream &  Mellanox OFED are Linux user-
> > space packages :
> > >  	1. Rdma-core is the Linux upstream user-space package.
> > >  	2. Mellanox OFED  is the Mellanox's Linux user-space package.
> > >  The difference is the APIs . We shall explain that difference in
> > > the release notes .
> >
> > The difference can be too much detail for release notes, I believe it
> > is good to mention in release notes the dependency requirement change,
> > as above commit log.
> >
> > But this commit log can have the detail.
> I will send a new PATCHv6 with an updated commit log . That contains this
> explanation above. The release notes will updated by Shahaf Shuler separately.
> 
> >
> > >
> > >              -Shachar Beiser.
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> I have squashed :
> > >>> [PATCH v2 3/3] “net/mlx5: fix interrupt enable return”
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpd
> > >> k
> > >>>
> > >>
> > .org%2Fdev%2Fpatchwork%2Fpatch%2F28380%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cshach
> > >> arbe%40m
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> ellanox.com%7Cc79d7690cb454f8dd41508d4fb771dea%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9b
> > >> a6a4d
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636409936407431479&sdata=T5wgSUeCx1tzM9Z
> > >> UnBAauNt
> > >>> iG4djfIpOJZOj%2FWM6v4Y%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> into this patch
> > >>>
> > >>> a. Compile with rdma-core commit f11292efd541 ("Merge pull request
> > >>> #202") b. Tested with linux kernel 4.13-rc4 c. For performance
> > >>> testing recommended to wait till kernel 4.14
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Shachar Beiser <shacharbe@mellanox.com>
> > >>
> > >> <...>
> > >