From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA381B7B9 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 16:07:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Apr 2018 07:07:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,427,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="35691199" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2018 07:07:49 -0700 Received: from FMSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:07:48 -0700 Received: from lcsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com (10.186.165.229) by fmsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:07:48 -0700 Received: from HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.223]) by LCSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.128]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:07:46 +0300 From: "Rosen, Rami" To: "Ma, Liang J" , "Yigit, Ferruh" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Mccarthy, Peter" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes Thread-Index: AdOhOWVoTRhA0m1vRJ2TOpB6odNJXQTYWZUABtUwtQAABvgpgA== Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F9531A0A1E@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F94C401373@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> <20180409134312.GA23402@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180409134312.GA23402@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOTgxZGU3M2YtMTE2YS00YzI5LTk1NmEtZDk1NDk5YjAxOWE0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjIuNS4xOCIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiJ3WG05TlVwWExtWGw2WjVaQUR2bkxjWTFyNG1HUCs4U3BWRnM3VE5Cc29oKzlnTVRzTlM1MjRHYjNBQlVsQzRwIn0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.249.87.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 14:07:51 -0000 Hi Liang, > Team agree stay with "Ordered Packet Distribution Library" name so far.= =20 > the roadmap information might need update Actually, now there is no need to update the roadmap, as OPDL does not appear there at all. (Back when I originally sent the first mail in this thread, it referred to = the roadmap where it appeared as Optimized and not Ordered, but now there i= s a new roadmap of 18.05). Regards, Rami=20 -----Original Message----- From: Ma, Liang J=20 Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 16:43 To: Yigit, Ferruh Cc: Rosen, Rami ; dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net; = Mccarthy, Peter Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes On 05 Mar 17:58, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/9/2018 12:08 AM, Rosen, Rami wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the recent announcement of DPDK 18.02-RC4, I went over > > 18.02 release notes and I have this minor query which I am not sure abo= ut: > > In the release notes: > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html > > we have the following: > > ... > > The OPDL (Ordered Packet Distribution Library) eventdev ... > >=20 > > While in http://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap We have: > > .... > > eventdev optimized packet distribution library (OPDL) driver ... > >=20 > > So I am not sure about this inconsistency -should it be "optimized" or = "ordered" ? >=20 > According driver documentation (doc/guides/eventdevs/opdl.rst) it is: > "Ordered Packet Distribution Library", release notes seems correct. >=20 > cc'ed maintainers. Hi Ferruh, Team agree stay with "Ordered Packet Distribution Library" name so far.= =20 the roadmap information might need update.=20 Many thanks Liang >=20 > >=20 > > Regards, > > Rami Rosen > >=20 > >=20 >=20