DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication in rcu	qsbr perf
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:33:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9B5688D2-D668-4EE4-9ECF-150BDEF5A292@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR08MB5814178EA784F486C344D91898110@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>



> On Nov 2, 2020, at 10:21 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> 
>> Avoid code duplication by combining single and multi threaded tests
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> ---
>> app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 362 ++++++++++-----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c index
>> 224c92fa3d65..229c835c23f7 100644
>> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
>> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ enum {
>> 	IP_CLASS_C
>> };
>> 
>> +enum {
>> +	SINGLE_WRITER = 1,
>> +	MULTI_WRITER_1,
>> +	MULTI_WRITER_2
>> +};
> Do we need this? Can we use the number of cores instead?
> 

There are 3 combinations of writes (adds/deletes):
1. Write all the entries - in case of a single writer
2. Write half of the entries - in case of multiple writers
3. Write remaining half of the entries - in case of multiple writers

So, I think this is required.

>> +
>> /* struct route_rule_count defines the total number of rules in following
>> a/b/c
>>  * each item in a[]/b[]/c[] is the number of common IP address class A/B/C,
>> not
>>  * including the ones for private local network.
>> @@ -430,11 +436,16 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)  {
>> 	unsigned int i, j, si, ei;
>> 	uint64_t begin, total_cycles;
>> -	uint8_t core_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
>> +	uint8_t writer_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
>> 	uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
>> 
>> -	/* 2 writer threads are used */
>> -	if (core_id % 2 == 0) {
>> +	/* Single writer (writer_id = 1) */
>> +	if (writer_id == SINGLE_WRITER) {
>> +		si = 0;
>> +		ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> +	}
>> +	/* 2 Writers (writer_id = 2/3)*/
>> +	else if (writer_id == MULTI_WRITER_1) {
>> 		si = 0;
>> 		ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES / 2;
>> 	} else {
>> @@ -447,29 +458,35 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>> 	for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>> 		/* Add all the entries */
>> 		for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
>> -			pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +			if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +				pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 			if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> 					large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
>> 					next_hop_add) != 0) {
>> 				printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> 					i, j);
>> -				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +				if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +
>> 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 				return -1;
>> 			}
>> -			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +			if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 		}
>> 
>> 		/* Delete all the entries */
>> 		for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
>> -			pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +			if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +				pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 			if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm,
>> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> 				large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
>> 				printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> 					i, j);
>> -				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +				if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +
>> 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 				return -1;
>> 			}
>> -			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> +			if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
>> +				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>> 		}
>> 	}
>> 
>> @@ -482,16 +499,17 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>> 
>> /*
>>  * Functional test:
>> - * 2 writers, rest are readers
>> + * 1/2 writers, rest are readers
>>  */
>> static int
>> -test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>> +test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(uint8_t use_rcu)
>> {
>> 	struct rte_lpm_config config;
>> 	size_t sz;
>> -	unsigned int i;
>> +	unsigned int i, j;
>> 	uint16_t core_id;
>> 	struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
>> +	int (*reader_f)(void *arg) = NULL;
>> 
>> 	if (rte_lcore_count() < 3) {
>> 		printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest,
>> expecting at least 3\n"); @@ -504,273 +522,76 @@
>> test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>> 		num_cores++;
>> 	}
>> 
>> -	printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration
>> enabled\n",
>> -		num_cores - 2);
>> -
>> -	/* Create LPM table */
>> -	config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.flags = 0;
>> -	lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
>> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
>> -
>> -	/* Init RCU variable */
>> -	sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
>> -	rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
>> -						RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> -	rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
>> -
>> -	rcu_cfg.v = rv;
>> -	/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
>> -	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg) != 0) {
>> -		printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
>> -		goto error;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 0;
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>> -
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> -
>> -	/* Launch reader threads */
>> -	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	/* Launch writer threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
>> -					(void *)(uintptr_t)i,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	/* Wait for writer threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			goto error;
>> -
>> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
>> -		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> -		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> -	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> -	rte_free(rv);
>> -	lpm = NULL;
>> -	rv = NULL;
>> -
>> -	/* Test without RCU integration */
>> -	printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration
>> disabled\n",
>> -		num_cores - 2);
>> -
>> -	/* Create LPM table */
>> -	config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.flags = 0;
>> -	lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
>> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 0;
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> -
>> -	/* Launch reader threads */
>> -	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	/* Launch writer threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
>> -					(void *)(uintptr_t)i,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	/* Wait for writer threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> -			goto error;
>> -
>> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
>> -		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> -		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> -	for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> -
>> -error:
>> -	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> -	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>> -
>> -	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> -	rte_free(rv);
>> -
>> -	return -1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Functional test:
>> - * Single writer, rest are readers
>> - */
>> -static int
>> -test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>> -{
>> -	struct rte_lpm_config config;
>> -	uint64_t begin, total_cycles;
>> -	size_t sz;
>> -	unsigned int i, j;
>> -	uint16_t core_id;
>> -	uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
>> -	struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
>> -
>> -	if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
>> -		printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest,
>> expecting at least 2\n");
>> -		return TEST_SKIPPED;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	num_cores = 0;
>> -	RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(core_id) {
>> -		enabled_core_ids[num_cores] = core_id;
>> -		num_cores++;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration enabled\n",
>> -		num_cores);
>> -
>> -	/* Create LPM table */
>> -	config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.flags = 0;
>> -	lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
>> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
>> -
>> -	/* Init RCU variable */
>> -	sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
>> -	rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
>> -						RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> -	rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
>> -
>> -	rcu_cfg.v = rv;
>> -	/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
>> -	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg) != 0) {
>> -		printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
>> -		goto error;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 0;
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> -
>> -	/* Launch reader threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	/* Measure add/delete. */
>> -	begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
>> -	for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>> -		/* Add all the entries */
>> -		for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
>> -			if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> -					large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
>> -					next_hop_add) != 0) {
>> -				printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> -					i, j);
>> +	for (j = 1; j < 3; j++) {
>> +		if (use_rcu)
>> +			printf("\nPerf test: %d writer(s), %d reader(s),"
>> +			       " RCU integration enabled\n", j, num_cores - j);
>> +		else
>> +			printf("\nPerf test: %d writer(s), %d reader(s),"
>> +			       " RCU integration disabled\n", j, num_cores - j);
>> +
>> +		/* Create LPM table */
>> +		config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> +		config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> +		config.flags = 0;
>> +		lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
>> +		TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
>> +
>> +		/* Init RCU variable */
>> +		if (use_rcu) {
>> +			sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
>> +			rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
>> +
>> 	RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> +			rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
>> +
>> +			rcu_cfg.v = rv;
>> +			/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
>> +			if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg) != 0) {
>> +				printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
>> 				goto error;
>> 			}
>> 
>> -		/* Delete all the entries */
>> -		for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
>> -			if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm,
>> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> -				large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
>> -				printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> -					i, j);
>> -				goto error;
>> -			}
>> -	}
>> -	total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
>> +			reader_f = test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader;
>> +		} else
>> +			reader_f = test_lpm_reader;
>> 
>> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
>> -		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>> +		writer_done = 0;
>> +		__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>> 
>> -	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> -	rte_free(rv);
>> -	lpm = NULL;
>> -	rv = NULL;
>> -
>> -	/* Test without RCU integration */
>> -	printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration
>> disabled\n",
>> -		num_cores);
>> -
>> -	/* Create LPM table */
>> -	config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
>> -	config.flags = 0;
>> -	lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
>> -	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
>> +		__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> 
>> -	writer_done = 0;
>> -	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> +		/* Launch reader threads */
>> +		for (i = j; i < num_cores; i++)
>> +			rte_eal_remote_launch(reader_f, NULL,
>> +						enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> 
>> -	/* Launch reader threads */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL,
>> -					enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> +		/* Launch writer threads */
>> +		for (i = 0; i < j; i++)
>> +			rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
>> +						(void *)(uintptr_t)(i + j),
> This can be just 'j'?
> 
>> +						enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> 
>> -	/* Measure add/delete. */
>> -	begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
>> -	for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>> -		/* Add all the entries */
>> -		for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
>> -			if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> -					large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
>> -					next_hop_add) != 0) {
>> -				printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> -					i, j);
>> +		/* Wait for writer threads */
>> +		for (i = 0; i < j; i++)
>> +			if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>> 				goto error;
>> -			}
>> 
>> -		/* Delete all the entries */
>> -		for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
>> -			if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm,
>> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
>> -				large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
>> -				printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route#
>> %d\n",
>> -					i, j);
>> -				goto error;
>> -			}
>> +		printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> +		printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> +		printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
>> +			__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles,
>> __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> +			/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>> +
>> +		writer_done = 1;
>> +		/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> +		for (i = j; i < num_cores; i++)
>> +			rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> +
>> +		rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> +		rte_free(rv);
>> +		lpm = NULL;
>> +		rv = NULL;
>> 	}
>> -	total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
>> -
>> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
>> -		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>> -
>> -	writer_done = 1;
>> -	/* Wait until all readers have exited */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>> -		rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
>> -
>> -	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 
>> 	return 0;
>> 
>> @@ -946,9 +767,8 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
>> 	rte_lpm_delete_all(lpm);
>> 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
>> 
>> -	test_lpm_rcu_perf();
>> -
>> -	test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer();
>> +	test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(0);
>> +	test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(1);
>> 
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-03  4:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29 15:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:17   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 22:11     ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 10:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation " David Marchand
2020-11-02 15:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 16:58   ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:21     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 17:33     ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 23:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:30     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:28     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:42       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:56       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  4:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:33       ` Dharmik Thakkar [this message]
2020-11-03  5:32         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03 14:03           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 14:51             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03 18:01             ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-03  5:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:21       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:22       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-04 15:46         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 16:49           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:34           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-05 15:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9B5688D2-D668-4EE4-9ECF-150BDEF5A292@arm.com \
    --to=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).