[dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Ilan Borenshtein]

Hello,

I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using  rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
The function returns with ENOTSUP.
Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?

Thanks,
Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Wu, Jingjing]

Hi

Flow director is not supported on VF now.
I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using
> rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Ilan Borenshtein]

Hi,

Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?

Thanks,
Ilan B


-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Hi

Flow director is not supported on VF now.
I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using 
> rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Wu, Jingjing]

Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or director packet to different queue in a VF?

For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try).
But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
> Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilan B
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
> To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hi
> 
> Flow director is not supported on VF now.
> I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using
> > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> > The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> > Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Ilan Borenshtein]

Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF.
Will it be implemented in future releases ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or director packet to different queue in a VF?

For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try).
But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
> Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilan B
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
> To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Hi
> 
> Flow director is not supported on VF now.
> I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan 
> > Borenshtein
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using 
> > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> > The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> > Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Wu, Jingjing]

Are you talking about 82599?

I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager to contribute to it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF.
> Will it be implemented in future releases ?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM
> To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or director packet to
> different queue in a VF?
> 
> For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flow director can do it
> (it's my understanding, haven't try).
> But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
> > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
> > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ilan B
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
> > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Flow director is not supported on VF now.
> > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan
> > > Borenshtein
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using
> > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> > > The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Ilan Borenshtein]

Yes, 82599.
I'll be updated.

Thank you for your answer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function


Are you talking about 82599?

I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager to contribute to it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF.
> Will it be implemented in future releases ?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM
> To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> 
> Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or 
> director packet to different queue in a VF?
> 
> For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, 
> the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try).
> But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
> > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
> > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ilan B
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
> > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Flow director is not supported on VF now.
> > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan 
> > > Borenshtein
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using 
> > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> > > The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ilan B

Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

[Vladimir Medvedkin]

Hi all,

According to 82599 datasheet it is possible to route packets to different
queues within VF. So in not VT mode rx_queue defines absolute queue number,
and in VT rx_queue defines relative queue number within VF.
I can make patch later when I will have free time.

Regards,
Vladimir


2014-08-19 12:08 GMT+04:00 Ilan Borenshtein <ilan@asocstech.com>:

> Yes, 82599.
> I'll be updated.
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:41 AM
> To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
>
>
> Are you talking about 82599?
>
> I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be
> volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are
> eager to contribute to it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM
> > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF.
> > Will it be implemented in future releases ?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM
> > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> >
> > Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or
> > director packet to different queue in a VF?
> >
> > For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using,
> > the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try).
> > But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
> > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the
> different Rx queues by a VF ?
> > > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ilan B
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
> > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Flow director is not supported on VF now.
> > > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan
> > > > Borenshtein
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> > > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using
> > > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> > > > The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> > > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> > > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ilan B
>