From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED74236D for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 02:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2014 17:41:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,881,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="586128442" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2014 17:41:00 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:56 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:55 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.17]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.219]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:40:03 +0800 From: "Wu, Jingjing" To: Ilan Borenshtein , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Signature filter for virtual function Thread-Index: Ac+3u2ouJ7b6cNiXT4+k2JCaYR6AgwAoZ+aQAGO51bAAJAhAoA== Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:40:02 +0000 Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD8DA4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:37:45 -0000 Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or direct= or packet to different queue in a VF? For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flo= w director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try). But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different R= x queues by a VF ? > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? >=20 > Thanks, > Ilan B >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Hi >=20 > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B