From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1358A593E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:37:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2014 00:40:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,892,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="590074111" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2014 00:40:55 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.75) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:40:55 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by fmsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:40:55 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.17]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.174]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:40:49 +0800 From: "Wu, Jingjing" To: Ilan Borenshtein , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Signature filter for virtual function Thread-Index: Ac+3u2ouJ7b6cNiXT4+k2JCaYR6AgwAoZ+aQAGO51bAAJAhAoAAN24FwADMBsHA= Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:40:49 +0000 Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD9AAA@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD8DA4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <7241f60d228f4a4dae39ed26f316d81c@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <7241f60d228f4a4dae39ed26f316d81c@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:37:34 -0000 Are you talking about 82599? I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be vol= unteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager t= o contribute to it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF. > Will it be implemented in future releases ? >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or dire= ctor packet to > different queue in a VF? >=20 > For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the f= low director can do it > (it's my understanding, haven't try). > But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different= Rx queues by a VF ? > > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi > > > > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan > > > Borenshtein > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using > > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ilan B