From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8555A1D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:39:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2015 16:39:41 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,740,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="649598906"
Received: from kmsmsx153.gar.corp.intel.com ([172.21.73.88])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2015 16:39:40 -0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by
 KMSMSX153.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:39:39 +0800
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.182]) by
 shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.216]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:39:38 +0800
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance
 issues
Thread-Index: AQHQGQmhQA9VD5m2XkOcLyxX2rZjnpy3aFPQgAAm3wCABD3JQA==
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:39:38 +0000
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8B6F07D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1418630187-28917-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com>
 <1418718200-31924-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com>
 <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8B6E3D0@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <7249650.ZI0koeX1QW@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <7249650.ZI0koeX1QW@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Rowden, Aaron F" <aaron.f.rowden@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance
 issues
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:39:43 -0000

Thanks, Thomas.

I supposed to review another patch for XL710 performance. Due to the simila=
r patch subject, I reviewed this applied patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:48 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin; Rowden, Aaron F
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance
> issues
>=20
> 2015-01-09 05:29, Wu, Jingjing:
> > Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
>=20
> Jingjing, this patch is already applied in version 1.8.0:
> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-December/010164.html
>=20
> --
> Thomas