From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5CB5697
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2015 01:29:42 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,681,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="580432457"
Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203])
by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2015 01:29:41 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by
FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 01:29:41 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by
fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 01:29:41 -0700
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.194]) by
SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.204]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:29:30 +0800
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix the wrong prompt for VF TSO
Thread-Index: AQHQ7DW4ilvMEBIkLUuI/UQDe58iHZ5q2jvg
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:29:30 +0000
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8D00B50@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1441936817-20767-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1441936817-20767-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix the wrong prompt for VF TSO
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:29:43 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenzhuo Lu
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 10:00 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix the wrong prompt for VF TSO
>=20
> When setting TSO on VF ixgbe NICs, for example, 82599, x550, the prompt
> that TSO is not supported will be printed. But TSO is supported by VF ixg=
be
> NICs.
> We should add TSO to the capability flag, so, we will not see the wrong
> prompt.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index b8ee1e9..23eeacc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -2444,7 +2444,8 @@ ixgbevf_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM;
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO;
>=20
> dev_info->default_rxconf =3D (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
> .rx_thresh =3D {
> --
> 1.9.3